Şenyayla and Others v. Türki̇Ye

SECOND SECTION

Application no. 9804/19 Hüsnü ŞENYAYLA against Türkiye and 10 other applications

(see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 4 April 2024 as a Committee composed of:

Frédéric Krenc , President , Diana Sârcu, Davor Derenčinović , judges ,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix.

The applicant’s complaints under Article 8 of the Convention concerning the electronic recording and storage of their private correspondence in the National Judicial Network System (UYAP) by the authorities during their detention, were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letters.

By letters dated 6 October 2023, sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired on 8 March 2023 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicants received these letters on the various dates, indicated in the appended table. However, no response has followed.

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court

finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications.

Accordingly, the applications should be struck out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.

Done in English and notified in writing on 25 April 2024.

Viktoriya Maradudina Frédéric Krenc Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application no.

Case name

Lodged on

Applicant Year of Birth

Represented by

Date on which the registered letter was delivered to the applicant

1.

9804/19

Şenyayla v. Türkiye

31/01/2019

Hüsnü ŞENYAYLA 1974

Mehmet ÜNLÜ

30/10/2023

2.

6476/20

Mart v. Türkiye

03/01/2020

Ufuk MART 1987

02/11/2023

3.

8058/20

Köksalan v. Türkiye

22/01/2020

Mustafa KÖKSALAN 1972

Mehmet Fatih ARSLAN

27/10/2023

4.

13485/20

Kocayılmaz v. Türkiye

25/02/2020

Ömer Faruk KOCAYILMAZ 1991

Mehmet Fatih ARSLAN

27/10/2023

5.

38025/20

Bulut v. Türkiye

04/08/2020

Ahmet BULUT 1980

30/10/2023

6.

53031/20

Kazıcı v. Türkiye

16/11/2020

Cemil KAZICI 1989

Mehmet Fatih ARSLAN

27/10/2023

7.

746/21

Tuştaş v. Türkiye

08/12/2020

Veysel TUŞTAŞ 1981

Bayram KAYA

27/10/2023

8.

12180/21

Koç v. Türkiye

10/02/2021

Asef KOÇ 1986

Eyyup KOÇ

26/10/2023

9.

17959/21

Dağ v. Türkiye

25/03/2021

Murat DAĞ 1986

Semra KISA

26/10/2023

10.

28488/21

Günerigök v. Türkiye

24/05/2021

Hamza GÜNERİGÖK 1987

Arafat SAV

01/11/2023

11.

28937/21

Hoşca v. Türkiye

27/05/2021

Fikret HOŞCA 1987

Erol Cağatay DEMİRTAŞ

25/10/2023