Kőrös and Others v. Hungary
Struck out of the list
Berörda konventionsartiklar
FIRST SECTION
Application no. 6211/24 Sámuel Tibor KŐRÖS against Hungary and 9 other applications
(see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 3 October 2024 as a Committee composed of:
Krzysztof Wojtyczek , President , Lətif Hüseynov, Erik Wennerström , judges ,
and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table.
The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.
The Court received friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 24 October 2024.
Attila Teplán Krzysztof Wojtyczek Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
(excessive length of criminal proceedings)
No.
Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Date of receipt of Government’s declaration
Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros) [1]
6211/24
24/02/2024
Sámuel Tibor KŐRÖS
1979
Kiss Dániel Bálint
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
16/08/2024
03/05/2024
3,300
6419/24
21/02/2024
Zoltán Róbert BERECZKI
1980
Kiss Dániel Bálint
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
16/08/2024
02/05/2024
6,500
7061/24
04/03/2024
János MOHÁCSI
1972
Kiss Dániel Bálint
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
21/08/2024
17/06/2024
3,300
7172/24
04/03/2024
Attila Csongor PUSZTAI
1970
Fahidi Gergely
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
21/08/2024
20/06/2024
3,300
7660/24
07/03/2024
László István OLÁH
1954
Paulusz Bogáta
Budapest
16/08/2024
05/06/2024
5,200
9208/24
19/03/2024
Csaba TAKÁCS
1977
Nagy Gábor
Budapest
28/08/2024
03/07/2024
1,700
9368/24
25/03/2024
Lajos SZÉPVÖLGYI
1979
Szabó Gábor
Göd
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
21/08/2024
27/06/2024
3,900
9369/24
25/03/2024
Lajosné SZÉPVÖLGYI
1954
Szabó Gábor
Göd
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
21/08/2024
27/06/2024
3,900
9425/24
20/03/2024
Zsolt KÓTÉ KAJETÁN
1985
Kiss Dániel Bálint
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
21/08/2024
14/06/2024
2,600
9811/24
13/03/2024
Aniko BUJKA
1963
Szabó Gábor
Göd
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
16/08/2024
12/06/2024
3,900
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.