lagen.nu
no. 15725/22

Bazakas and Others v. Greece

Struck out of the list

Domstol
European Court of Human Rights
Avgörandedatum
2025-12-18
ECLI
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1218DEC001572522
Artiklar
3, 13, 39
Källa
hudoc.echr.coe.int

Berörda konventionsartiklar

THIRD SECTION

Application no. 15725/22 Athanasios BAZAKAS against Greece and 6 other applications (see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 18 December 2025 as a Committee composed of:

Diana Kovatcheva , President , Canòlic Mingorance Cairat, Vasilka Sancin , judges ,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.

The applicants were represented by Mr K. Tsitselikis and Mr A. Spathis, two lawyers practising in Thessaloniki.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Greek Government (“the Government”). In all the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention.

The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications.

The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention at the Korydallos Prison as regards all the applicants, and at Patras Prison as regards the applicant in application no. 16258/22. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table, provided that the applicants “have not been awarded any compensation for the same reason under Article 6A of the [Greek] Penitentiary Code or any other remedy, taking into consideration the duration of their detention in Korydallos I Detention Facility in such conditions”.

They invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.

The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations.

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declarations made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications in the part covered by

the Government’s declarations as accepted by the applicants.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the applications in that part

out of the Court’s list.

As regards the remaining complaints raised by the applicants, taking into account the facts of the case, the Government’s declarations and the Court’s decision to strike out the part of the applications relating to the complaints under Article 3 of the Convention, the Court considers that the main legal question raised in the present applications has been resolved. It concludes, therefore, that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints raised by the applicants under Article 13 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the part of the applications as covered by the Government’s declarations and accepted by the applicants, out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention;

Decides that there is no need to examine separately the remaining part of the applications.

Done in English and notified in writing on 22 January 2026.

Viktoriya Maradudina Diana Kovatcheva Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention

(inadequate conditions of detention)

No.

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location

Other complaints under well ‑ established case ‑ law

Date of receipt of Government’s declaration

Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance

Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses

per applicant

(in euros) [1]

15725/22

28/02/2022

Athanasios BAZAKAS

1963

Tsitselikis Konstantinos

Thessaloniki

Spathis Antonios

Thessaloniki

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

20/11/2025

21/11/2025

5,400

15730/22

28/02/2022

Lazaros KORKOLIS

1987

Tsitselikis Konstantinos

Thessaloniki

Spathis Antonios

Thessaloniki

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

20/11/2025

21/11/2025

4,200

16258/22

24/03/2022

Konstantinos LIATIS

1967

Tsitselikis Konstantinos

Thessaloniki

Spathis Antonios

Thessaloniki

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

20/11/2025

21/11/2025

2,900

41900/22

22/02/2021

Diogenis PAPATHANASIOU

1972

Tsitselikis Konstantinos

Thessaloniki

Spathis Antonios

Thessaloniki

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

17/11/2025

24/11/2025

4,900

41908/22

22/02/2021

Konstantinos TASSOS

1991

Tsitselikis Konstantinos

Thessaloniki

Spathis Antonios

Thessaloniki

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

17/11/2025

24/11/2025

4,700

42407/22

17/03/2021

Chrysovalantis FLEVARIS

1981

Tsitselikis Konstantinos

Thessaloniki

Spathis Antonios

Thessaloniki

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

18/11/2025

21/11/2025

4,600

42419/22

17/03/2021

Petros GIANNOULIS

1970

Tsitselikis Konstantinos

Thessaloniki

Spathis Antonios

Thessaloniki

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

18/11/2025

21/11/2025

6,500

[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.