Ország and Others v. Hungary
Struck out of the list
Berörda konventionsartiklar
SECOND SECTION
Application no. 2923/26 Máriusz ORSZÁG against Hungary and 9 other applications
(see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 17 September 2026 as a Committee composed of:
Stéphane Pisani , President , Juha Lavapuro, Hugh Mercer , judges ,
and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications against Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table.
The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.
The Court received friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 8 October 2026.
Attila Teplán Stéphane Pisani Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
(excessive length of criminal proceedings)
No.
Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Other complaints under well ‑ established case-law
Date of receipt of Government’s declaration
Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros) [1]
2923/26
15/01/2026
Máriusz ORSZÁG
1999
Kiss Dániel Bálint
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
17/08/2026
29/04/2026
3,300
5840/26
02/02/2026
Krisztina KÁLLAI
1983
Szabó Gábor
Göd
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
10/08/2026
03/07/2026
3,300
5841/26
02/02/2026
Tibor Tamás RAJK
1987
Szabó Gábor
Göd
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
11/08/2026
03/07/2026
3,300
5908/26
26/01/2026
Roland BARTUS
1979
Szabó Gábor
Göd
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
17/08/2026
06/07/2026
2,600
6592/26
02/02/2026
Ibolya Julianna KÁNTOR
1963
Jánosi Barbara
Budapest
10/08/2026
04/06/2026
6,800
9386/26
20/02/2026
András TÓTH
1983
Szabó Gábor
Göd
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
17/08/2026
08/07/2026
2,300
9491/26
26/02/2026
Rudolf Renátó LAKATOS
1995
Kiss Dániel Bálint
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
10/08/2026
01/06/2026
3,300
10750/26
05/03/2026
Gábor FARKAS
1984
Szabó Gábor
Göd
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
17/08/2026
08/07/2026
3,300
12326/26
16/03/2026
Csaba NÉMETH
2001
Szabó Gábor
Göd
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
10/08/2026
08/07/2026
3,900
13265/26
23/03/2026
Zoltán Péter NYÍRŐ
1976
Arató Bence
Budapest
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings
10/08/2026
15/06/2026
4,800
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.