Alaniva v. Sweden



AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF

Application No. 13819/88

by Elli and Airi ALANIVA

against Sweden

The European Commission of Human Rights sitting in private

on 11 October 1990 the following members being present:

MM. C. A. NØRGAARD, President

J. A. FROWEIN

S. TRECHSEL

F. ERMACORA

G. SPERDUTI

E. BUSUTTIL

G. JÖRUNDSSON

A. S. GÖZÜBÜYÜK

A. WEITZEL

J. C. SOYER

H. G. SCHERMERS

H. DANELIUS

Mrs. G. H. THUNE

Sir Basil HALL

Mr. F. MARTINEZ

Mr. C.L. ROZAKIS

Mrs. J. LIDDY

MM. L. LOUCAIDES

J.-C. GEUS

A.V. ALMEIDA RIBEIRO

M.P. PELLONPÄÄ

Mr. H. C. KRÜGER Secretary to the Commission

Having regard to Article 25 of the Convention for the

Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;

Having regard to the application introduced on 29 April 1987

by Elli and Airi ALANIVA against Sweden and registered on 2 May 1988

under file No. 13819/88;

Having regard to the report provided for in Rule 47 of the

Rules of Procedure of the Commission;

Having deliberated;

Decides as follows:

The applicants, mother and daughter, were born in 1936 and

1960 respectively. The mother is a Finnish citizen and the daughter

is a Swedish citizen. They reside in Västerås.

Before the Commission the applicants complain of the manner in

which the Social Insurance Offices (allmänna försäkringskassorna) in

the County of Västmanland and the County of Stockholm have dealt with

the applicants' case concerning advance maintenance payment

(bidragsförskott) and the recovery of maintenance allowance

(underhållsbidrag) in Finland.

The applicants allege violations of Article 1 of Protocol No.

1 to the Convention and Article 13 (P1-1, Art. 13) of the Convention.

The final decision is a decision of 11 November 1986 whereby the

Supreme Administrative Court (regeringsrätten) in re-opening

proceedings (resning) refused to examine the applicants' case further.

The Commission has examined the applicants' separate

complaints as they have been submitted by them. However, after

considering the case as a whole, the Commission finds that it does not

disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms

invoked by the applicants.

It follows that the application is as a whole manifestly

ill-founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 (Art. 27-2) of the

Convention.

For these reasons, the Commission unanimously

DECLARES THE APPLICATION INADMISSIBLE

Secretary to the Commission President of the Commission

(H.C. Krüger) (C.A. Nørgaard)