lagen.nu
AMC & GM to Part-66 — Issue 2, Amendment 1

AMC & GM to Part-66 — Issue 2, Amendment 1

Utgivare
Europeiska unionens byrå för luftfartssäkerhet
Antagen
2016-07-12
Utfärdat genom
ED Decision 2016/011/R
Språk
engelska
Ämnesord
Part-66 - Maintenance certifying staff
Källa
www.easa.europa.eu
Endast på engelskaEuropeiska unionens byrå för luftfartssäkerhet har inte publicerat någon svensk version av detta dokument. Texten nedan återges på engelska, så som den publicerats av Europeiska unionens byrå för luftfartssäkerhet.

Annex III to ED Decision 2016/011/R

European Aviation Safety Agency

Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) and Guidance Material (GM) to Annex III (PART-66) to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014

Issue 2 — Amendment 1 2 11.7.2016

Annex III to ED Decision 2016/011/R 1) In the table of contents, the heading of AMC 66.B.310(a) is replaced by the following:

‘AMC 66.B.310(a) Conversion report for approved maintenance organisations’ authorisations’

2) GM 66.A.3 is amended as follows:

‘GM 66.A.3 Licence categories Individual aircraft maintenance licence holders need not to be restricted to a single category. Provided that each qualification requirement is satisfied, any combination of categories may be granted.’

3) GM 66.A.70(d) is replaced by the following:

‘GM 66.A.70(d) Conversion provisions For aircraft not used by air carriers licensed in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 other than complex motor-powered aircraft, an example of limitations could be where a person holds a pre-Part-66 qualification which covered privileges to release work performed on aircraft structures, powerplant, mechanical and electrical systems but excluded privileges on aircraft equipped with turbine engine, aircraft above 2 000 kg MTOM, pressurised aircraft and aircraft equipped with retractable landing gear. This person would be issued with a Part-66 aircraft maintenance licence in the B1.2 or B3 (sub)category with the following limitations (exclusions): — aircraft used by air carriers licensed in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1008/2008 (this limitation always exists); — aircraft above 2 000 kg MTOM; — pressurised aircraft; — aircraft equipped with retractable landing gear. Another example of limitations could be where a pilot-owner holds a pre-Part-66 qualification which covered privileges to release work performed on aircraft structures, powerplant, mechanical and electrical systems but limited to their own aircraft and limited to a particular aircraft type (for example, a Cessna 172). This pilot-owner would receive a Part-66 aircraft maintenance licence in the B1.2 or B3 (sub)category with the following limitations (exclusions): — aircraft used by air carriers licensed in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 (this limitation always exists); — aircraft other than a Cessna 172; — aircraft not owned by the licence holder. The essential aspect is that the limitations are established in order to maintain the privileges of the pre- Part-66 qualification without comparing the previous qualification with the standard of Part-66 Appendix I and II. For removal of limitations, refer to 66.A.50(c).’

4) AMC 66.B.305(a) is amended as follows:

‘AMC 66.B.305(a) Conversion report for national qualifications

1. Conversion reports prepared on the basis of point 66.A.70(c) should include a comparison between the scope of the national qualification (i.e., the national qualification requirements) and the scope of

Annex III to ED Decision 2016/011/R

the Part-66 licence qualification (i.e., the Part-66 qualification requirements), which should be performed on the basis of a detailed analysis of the national and Part-66 basic qualification standards. The report should identify where a difference between the two standards exists and where such a difference would lead to a limitation on the Part-66 licence.

2. Conversion reports prepared on the basis of point 66.A.70(d), which are limited to other-thancomplex motor-powered aircraft not involved in commercial air transport other than large aircraft used by air carriers licensed in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 should include the privileges associated to the national qualification. The reports should identify which limitations are needed on to the Part-66 licence in order to maintain these privileges.’

5) AMC 66.B.310(a) is amended as follows:

‘AMC 66.B.310(a) Conversion report for national qualifications approved maintenance organisations’

authorisations

1. Conversion reports prepared on the basis of point 66.A.70(c) should include a comparison between the qualification required for each type of organisation authorisation and the scope of the Part-66 licence qualification, which should be performed on the basis of a detailed analysis of the organisation and Part-66 basic qualification standards. The report should identify where a difference between the two standards exists and where such a difference would lead to a limitation on the Part- 66 licence. 2. Conversion reports prepared on the basis of point 66.A.70(d), which is are limited to other-thancomplex motor-powered aircraft not involved in commercial air transport other than large aircraft used by air carriers licensed in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 should include the privileges associated to the organisation authorisation. The reports should identify which limitations are needed on to the Part-66 licence in order to maintain these privileges.’

6) Point 4 of AMC to paragraph 3.1(d) of Appendix III to Part-66 is amended as follows:

‘AMC to Paragraph point 3.1(d) of Appendix III to Part-66 ‘Aircraft Type Training and Examination

Standard. On-the-Job Training’

(…) 4. In order to approve a reduction of such minimum duration, the evaluation done by the competent authority should be performed on a case-by-case basis appropriate to the aircraft type. For example, while it would be exceptional for a theoretical course for a large transport category complex motorpowered aircraft such as an A330 or B757 to be below the minimum duration shown, it would not necessarily be exceptional in the case of a General Aviation (GA) business aircraft such as a Learjet 45 or similar. Typically, the TNA for a GA aircraft course would demonstrate that a course of a shorter duration satisfies the requirements. (…)’

Fotnoter

  1. Commission Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 of 26 November 2014 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks (OJ L 362, 17.12.2014, p. 1), as last amended. 2 For the date of entry into force of this Issue, please refer to Decision 2016/011/R in the Official Publication of the Agency.