lagen.nu
31993R0029

31993R0029

CELEX
31993R0029
Datum
1993-01-09
Källa
eur-lex.europa.eu

No L 5/ 14 Official Journal of the European Communities 9 . 1 . 93

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 29/93 of 8 January 1993 fixing the import levies on white sugar and raw sugar

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, crossing point which was fixed at Rotterdam by Regula­ tion (EEC) No 431 /68 of the Council of 9 April 1968 determining the standard quality for raw sugar and fixing Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European the Community frontier crossing point for calculating cif Economic Community, prices for sugar (6) ;

Having regard to the Act of Accession of Spain and Portugal, Whereas this price must be based on the most favourable Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 purchasing opportunities on the world market established for each product on the basis of quotations or prices on of 30 June 1981 on the common organization of the that market adjusted for any deviation from the standard market in sugar ('), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3814/92 (2), and in particular Article 16 (8) thereof, quality for which the threshold price is fixed ; whereas the standard quality for raw sugar was defined by Regulation (EEC) No 431 /68 and that for white sugar by Regulation Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3813/92 (EEC) No 793/72 Q ; of 28 December 1992 on the unit of account and the conversion rates to be applied for the purposes of the common agricultural policy (3), and in particular Article 5 thereof, Whereas, when the most favourable purchasing opportu­ nities on the world market are being established, the Whereas Article 16 (1 ) of Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 Commission must take account of all available informa­ provides for charging a levy on imports of the products tion on offers on the world market, on quotations on the listed in Article 1 (1 ) of that Regulation ; exchanges which are important for world trade, on prices recorded on important third-country markets, and on sales concluded in international trade of which it has Whereas the import levy on white sugar and raw sugar knowledge either directly or through the agency of the must be equal to the threshold price less the cif price ; Member States ; whereas the threshold price for each of these products was fixed by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1 748/92 (4) fixing, for the 1992/93 marketing year, the derived intervention prices for white sugar, the intervention price for raw Whereas, however, pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No sugar, the minimum prices for A and B beet, the thre­ 784/68 of the Commission of 26 June 1968 laying down shold prices, the amount of compensation for storage detailed rules for calculating cif prices for white sugar and costs and the prices to be applied in Spain and Portugal ; raw sugar (8), the Commission must disregard information if the goods concerned are not of sound and fair marke­ Whereas, pursuant to Article 101 ( 1 ) of Council Decision table quality or if the price quoted in an offer relates to 91 /482/EEC of 25 July 1991 on the association of the small quantities and is not representative of the market ; overseas countries and territories with the European whereas offer prices which can be assumed not to be Economic Community Q, no levies shall apply on representative of the actual market trends must also be imports of products originating in the overseas countries disregarded ; and territories ; whereas, however, pursuant to Article 101 (4) of the abovementioned Decision, a special amount shall be charged on imports of certain products origi­ nating in the overseas countries and territories in order to Whereas any offer or prices taken into consideration prevent products originating from these countries and which are not for goods delivered in bulk cif Rotterdam territories from receiving more favourable treatment than must be adjusted ; whereas when this adjustment is being similar products imported from Spain or Portugal into the made account must be taken of the difference in the cost Community as constituted on 31 December 1985 ; of transporting the goods between the port of loading and the port of destination and between the port of loading and Rotterdam ; whereas, if the price or the offer relates Whereas the cif price for raw sugar and white sugar is to goods in bags, it must be reduced by ECU 0,73 per 100 calculated by the Commission for a Community frontier kilograms under the terms of Article 4 of Regulation (EEC) No 784/68 ; (') OJ No L 177, 1 . 7. 1981 , p. 4. (2) OJ No L 387, 31 . 12. 1992, p. 7. O OJ No L 387, 31 . 12. 1992, p. 1 . (6) OJ No L 89, 10. 4. 1968, p. 3. (4) OJ No L 181 , 1 . 7. 1992, p. 13. f) OJ No L 94, 21 . 4. 1972, p. 1 . (0 OJ No L 263, 19. 9. 1991 , p. 1 . (8) OJ No L 145, 27. 6. 1968 , p. 10 .

9 . 1 . 93 No L 5/ 15 Official Journal of the European Communities

Whereas, if information on sugar of the standard quality Whereas, in accordance with Article 21 (1 ) of Regulation is to be comparable, the price increases or reductions (EEC) No 1785/81 , the nomenclature provided for in this fixed pursuant to Article 15 of Regulation (EEC) No Regulation is incorporated in the Common Customs 1785/81 must be added to or deducted from the offers Tariff ; taken into consideration in the case of white sugar ; Whereas, in order to make it possible for the levy arrange­ whereas, in the case of raw sugar, the corrective factors ments to function normally, the representative market provided for in Article 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 784/68 rate established during the reference period from 7 must be applied ; January 1993, as regards floating currencies, should be used to calculate the levies ; Whereas, pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 784/68, a special cif price may be established for sugar Whereas it follows from applying these provisions that which has been specially treated or specially packed if the the levies for white sugar and raw sugar should be as set offer price for such sugar is lower than the cif price out in the Annex hereto, established pursuant to the provisions referred to above ;

Whereas a cif price may, by way of exception, be left HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION : unchanged for a limited period if the offer price which served as a basis for the previous calculation of the cif Article 1 price is not available to the Commission and if the offer prices which are available and which appear not to be The import levies referred to in Article 16 ( 1 ) 'of Regula­ sufficiently representative of actual market trends would tion (EEC) No 1785/81 shall be, in respect of white sugar entail sudden and considerable changes in the cif price ; and standard quality raw sugar, as set out in the Annex hereto. Whereas the levy is altered only if the variation in the elements used to calculate it would entail an increase or a Article 2 reduction of not less than ECU 0,24 per 100 kilograms in relation to the levy previously fixed ; This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 January 1993.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States .

Done at Brussels, 8 January 1993.

For the Commission Rene STEICHEN Member of the Commission

No L 5/ 16 9 . 1 . 93 Official Journal of the European Communities

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 8 January 1993fixing the import levies on white sugar and raw sugar

(ECU/100 kg)

CN code Levy (3)

1701 11 10 40,29 (') 1701 11 90 40,29 (') 1701 12 10 40,29 (') 1701 12 90 40,29 (') 1701 91 00 46,40 1701 99 10 46,40 1701 99 90 46,40 (2)

(') The levy applicable is calculated in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 or 3 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 837/68. (2) In accordance with Article 16 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 this amount is also applicable to sugar obtained from white and raw sugar containing added substances other than flavouring or colouring matter. (3) No import levy applies to OCT originating products according to Article 101 (1 ) of Decision 91 /482/EEC. However, an amount equal to the amount fixed by Regulation (EEC) No 1870/91 B to be levied in accordance with Article 101 (4) of the abovementioned Decision.