lagen.nu
(EU) 2024/1485

Concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Russia

Titel
Council Regulation (EU) 2024/1485 of 27 May 2024 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Russia
CELEX
32024R1485
Datum
2024-05-27
Konsoliderad t.o.m.
2026-09-28
Jämför lydelser 10
Källa
eur-lex.europa.eu
Konsoliderad versionTexten nedan är Publikationsbyråns konsoliderade version, med ändringar införda genom förordning (EU) 2024/1488, förordning (EU) 2024/2465, förordning (EU) 2025/958, förordning (EU) 2025/1081, förordning (EU) 2025/1438, förordning (EU) 2025/2356, förordning (EU) 2025/2638, förordning (EU) 2026/431, förordning (EU) 2026/1147, förordning (EU) 2026/1362, förordning (EU) 2026/1708 och förordning (EU) 2026/2193. Grundrättsakten och ändringsrättsakterna är de officiella texterna.

EUROPEISKA UNIONENS RÅD HAR ANTAGIT DENNA FÖRORDNING

med beaktande av fördraget om Europeiska unionens funktionssätt, särskilt artikel 215,

med beaktande av rådets beslut (Gusp) 2024/1484 av den 27 maj 2024 om restriktiva åtgärder med anledning av situationen i Ryssland,

med beaktande av det gemensamma förslaget från unionens höga representant för utrikes frågor och säkerhetspolitik och Europeiska kommissionen, och

Skälen nedan är grundrättsaktens. Ändringsrättsakternas skäl: förordning (EU) 2024/1488 · förordning (EU) 2024/2465 · förordning (EU) 2025/958 · förordning (EU) 2025/1081 · förordning (EU) 2025/1438 · förordning (EU) 2025/2356 · förordning (EU) 2025/2638 · förordning (EU) 2026/431 · förordning (EU) 2026/1147 · förordning (EU) 2026/1362 · förordning (EU) 2026/1708 · förordning (EU) 2026/2193.

(1) Den 27 maj 2024 antog rådet beslut (Gusp) 2024/1484, genom vilket det fastställs en ram för riktade restriktiva åtgärder med anledning av situationen i Ryssland och det interna förtrycket i landet. Den politiska bakgrunden och de politiska skälen för inrättandet av de restriktiva åtgärderna anges i skälen till det beslutet.

(2) Internt förtryck anses inbegripa bland annat tortyr och annan grym, omänsklig och förnedrande behandling eller bestraffning, summariska eller godtyckliga avrättningar, försvinnanden, godtyckliga gripanden och andra allvarliga kränkningar av de mänskliga rättigheter och de grundläggande friheter som anges i relevanta internationella instrument som rör de mänskliga rättigheterna, inklusive den allmänna förklaringen om de mänskliga rättigheterna och den internationella konventionen om medborgerliga och politiska rättigheter.

(3) Beslut (Gusp) 2024/1484 föreskriver reseförbud för fysiska personer som förtecknas i bilagan till det beslutet och frysning av medel och ekonomiska resurser samt förbud mot att göra medel och ekonomiska resurser tillgängliga för fysiska eller juridiska personer, enheter eller organ som förtecknas i den bilagan. I det beslutet föreskrivs också vissa sektoriella exportrestriktioner för produkter som skulle kunna användas för internt förtryck samt produkter avsedda främst för användning vid övervakning eller avlyssning av informationssäkerhet och telekommunikation.

(4) De restriktioner som införs genom denna förordning avseende produkter som förtecknas i bilagorna I och II till denna förordning påverkar inte de restriktioner som är tillämpliga enligt rådets förordning (EU) nr 833/2014. Om en produkt omfattas av en av de kategorier som anges i bilaga I eller II till den här förordningen och även omfattas av tillämpningsområdet för förordning (EU) nr 833/2014, bör de restriktioner som anges i förordning (EU) nr 833/2014 tillämpas.

(5) Bilaga II till denna förordning anger kategorier av produkter som bedöms vara relevanta för använding för internt förtryck på grundval av deras tekniska kapacitet. Om en produkt omfattas av tillämpningsområdet för förordning (EU) nr 833/2014 bör restriktionerna i förordning (EU) nr 833/2014 vara tillämpliga oavsett om produkten har den tekniska kapacitet som anges i bilaga II till den här förordningen.

(6) Information om avsedd användning av utrustning, teknik eller programvara för internt förtryck i Ryssland får erhållas på valfritt sätt, inbegripet genom aktörens egna efterforskningar, information som tillhandahålls av behöriga myndigheter eller offentligt tillgängliga källor.

(7) De åtgärderna faller inom tillämpningsområdet för fördraget om Europeiska unionens funktionssätt och lagstiftningsåtgärder på unionsnivå är nödvändiga för att genomföra dem, särskilt för att de ska tillämpas på ett enhetligt sätt av ekonomiska aktörer i alla medlemsstater.

(8) Denna förordning står i överensstämmelse med de grundläggande rättigheterna och iakttar de principer som erkänns i Europeiska unionens stadga om de grundläggande rättigheterna, i synnerhet rätten till ett effektivt rättsmedel och en rättvis rättegång, rätten till försvar och rätten till skydd av personuppgifter. Denna förordning bör tillämpas i enlighet med dessa rättigheter.

(9) Förfarandet för att ändra förteckningen i bilaga IV till denna förordning bör inbegripa att de fysiska och juridiska personer, enheter eller organ som är uppförda på förteckningen informeras om skälen till detta, så att de ges möjlighet att lämna synpunkter.

(10) För att genomföra denna förordning och för att säkerställa största möjliga rättssäkerhet inom unionen bör namn och andra relevanta uppgifter avseende de fysiska och juridiska personer, enheter och organ vars medel och ekonomiska resurser ska frysas i enlighet med denna förordning offentliggöras. All behandling av personuppgifter bör vara förenlig med Europaparlamentets och rådets förordningar (EU) 2016/679 och (EU) 2018/1725.

(11) Medlemsstaterna och kommissionen bör underrätta varandra om de åtgärder som vidtas enligt denna förordning och om andra relevanta uppgifter med anknytning till denna förordning som de förfogar över.

(12) Medlemsstaterna bör fastställa regler om sanktioner för överträdelser av bestämmelserna i denna förordning. Sanktionerna bör vara effektiva, proportionella och avskräckande.

HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE.

Article1

For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions apply:

a) ‘brokering services’ means:

i) the negotiation or arrangement of transactions for the purchase, sale or supply of goods and technology or of financial and technical services, including from a third country to any other third country; or

ii) the selling or buying of goods and technology or of financial and technical services, including where they are located in third countries for their transfer to another third country;

b) ‘claim’ means any claim, whether asserted by legal proceedings or not, made before or after the date of entry into force of this Regulation, under or in connection with a contract or transaction, and in particular:

i) a claim for performance of any obligation arising under or in connection with a contract or transaction;

ii) a claim for extension or payment of a bond, financial guarantee or indemnity of whatever form;

iii) a claim for compensation in respect of a contract or transaction;

iv) a counterclaim;

v) a claim for the recognition or enforcement, including by the procedure of exequatur, of a judgment, an arbitration award or an equivalent decision, wherever made or given;

c) ‘contract or transaction’ means any transaction of whatever form and whatever the applicable law, whether comprising one or more contracts or similar obligations made between the same or different parties; for that purpose ‘contract’ includes a bond, guarantee or indemnity, particularly a financial guarantee or financial indemnity, and credit, whether legally independent or not, as well as any related provision arising under, or in connection with, the transaction;

d) ‘competent authorities’ means the competent authorities of the Member States as identified on the websites listed in Annex III;

e) ‘economic resources’ means assets of every kind, whether tangible or intangible, movable or immovable, which are not funds, but may be used to obtain funds, goods or services;

f) ‘financing or financial assistance’ means any action, irrespective of the particular means chosen, whereby the natural or legal person, entity or body concerned, conditionally or unconditionally, disburses or commits to disburse its own funds or economic resources, including but not limited to grants, loans, guarantees, suretyships, bonds, letters of credit, supplier credits, buyer credits, import or export advances and all types of insurance and reinsurance, including export credit insurance; payment as well as terms and conditions of payment of the agreed price for a good or a service, made in line with normal business practice, do not constitute financing or financial assistance;

g) ‘freezing of economic resources’ means preventing the use of economic resources to obtain funds, goods or services in any way, including, but not limited to, by selling, hiring or mortgaging them;

h) ‘freezing of funds’ means preventing any move, transfer, alteration, use of, access to, or dealing with funds in any way that would result in any change in their volume, amount, location, ownership, possession, character, destination or other change that would enable the funds to be used, including portfolio management;

i) ‘funds’ means financial assets and benefit of every kind, including, but not limited to:

i) cash, cheques, claims on money, drafts, money orders and other payment instruments;

ii) deposits with financial institutions or other entities, balances on accounts, debts and debt obligations;

iii) publicly and privately-traded securities and debt instruments, including stocks and shares, certificates representing securities, bonds, notes, warrants, debentures and derivatives contracts;

iv) interest, dividends or other income on or value accruing from or generated by assets;

v) credit, right of set-off, guarantees, performance bonds or other financial commitments;

vi) letters of credit, bills of lading, bills of sale;

vii) documents showing evidence of an interest in funds or financial resources;

j) ‘technical assistance’ means any technical support related to repairs, development, manufacture, assembly, testing, maintenance, or any other technical service, and may take forms such as instruction, advice, training, transmission of working knowledge or skills or consulting services, including verbal forms of assistance;

k) ‘territory of the Union’ means the territories of the Member States to which the Treaty on European Union applies, under the conditions laid down therein, including their airspace.

Article2

1. It shall be prohibited:

a) to sell, supply, transfer or export, directly or indirectly, equipment which might be used for internal repression as listed in Annex I, whether or not originating in the Union, to any natural or legal person, entity or body in Russia or for use in Russia;

b) to provide technical assistance or brokering services related to the equipment referred to in point (a), directly or indirectly to any natural or legal person, entity or body in Russia or for use in Russia;

c) to provide financing or financial assistance, including in particular grants, loans and export credit insurance, as well as insurance and reinsurance, related to the equipment referred to in point (a), directly or indirectly to any natural or legal person, entity or body in Russia or for use in Russia.

2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to protective equipment temporarily exported to Russia by UN personnel, personnel of the Union or its Member States, representatives of the media, and humanitarian and development workers and associated personnel for their personal use only.

3. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, the competent authorities may authorise, under such conditions as they deem appropriate, the sale, supply, transfer or export of equipment which might be used for internal repression as listed in Annex I, and associated financing and financial and technical assistance, intended solely for humanitarian or protective use, for institution-building programmes of the UN or the Union, or for crisis-management operations of the UN and of the Union or of regional and subregional organisations.

4. The authorisations referred to in paragraph 3 may be granted only prior to the activity for which they are requested. The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisation granted under this Article within 4 weeks of the authorisation.

5. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, the competent authorities may authorise the sale, supply, transfer, export or provision of the assistance or services referred to therein after having determined that this is necessary for:

a) the functioning of diplomatic and consular representations of the Union and of the Member States or partner countries in Russia, including delegations, embassies and missions, or international organisations in Russia enjoying immunities in accordance with international law;

b) the provision of electronic communication services by Union telecommunication operators, for the provision of associated facilities and services necessary for the operation, maintenance and security of such electronic communication services, in Russia, in Ukraine, in the Union, between Russia and the Union, and between Ukraine and the Union, and for data centre services in the Union.

Article3

1. It shall be prohibited to sell, supply, transfer or export, directly or indirectly, equipment, technology or software listed in Annex II, whether or not originating in the Union, to any natural or legal person, entity or body in Russia or for use in Russia, unless the competent authority of the relevant Member State has given prior authorisation.

2. The competent authorities shall not grant any authorisation under paragraph 1 if they have reasonable grounds to determine that the equipment, technology or software in question would be used for internal repression by Russia’s government, public bodies, corporations or agencies, or any person or entity acting on their behalf or at their direction.

3. Annex II shall include information security and telecommunications equipment, technology or software that could be misused for internal repression.

4. By way of derogation from paragraphs 1 and 2, the competent authorities may authorise the sale, supply, transfer, export, or provision of the services referred to therein, under such conditions as they deem appropriate, after having determined that this is necessary for:

a) the functioning of diplomatic and consular representations of the Union and of the Member States or partner countries in Russia, including delegations, embassies and missions, or international organisations in Russia enjoying immunities in accordance with international law;

b) the provision of electronic communication services by Union telecommunication operators necessary for the operation, maintenance and security, including cybersecurity, of electronic communication services, in Russia, in Ukraine, in the Union, between Russia and the Union, and between Ukraine and the Union, and for data centre services in the Union.

5. The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisation granted under this Article within 4 weeks of the authorisation.

6. The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisation denied under this Article within 4 weeks of that denial.

7. This Article is without prejudice to Article 2a of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014.

Article4

1. Unless the competent authority of the relevant Member State has given prior authorisation in accordance with Article 3(1), it shall be prohibited to:

a) provide, directly or indirectly, technical assistance or brokering services related to the equipment, technology and software listed in Annex II, related to the installation, provision, manufacture, maintenance, repair and use of the equipment and technology listed in Annex II, or related to the provision, installation, operation or updating of any software listed in Annex II to any natural or legal person, entity or body in Russia or for use in Russia;

b) provide, directly or indirectly, financing or financial assistance related to the equipment, technology and software listed in Annex II to any natural or legal person, entity or body in Russia or for use in Russia;

c) provide any telecommunication or internet monitoring or interception services to, or for the direct or indirect benefit of, Russia’s government, public bodies, corporations and agencies or any person or entity acting on their behalf or at their direction.

2. For the purposes of point (a) of paragraph 1, the prohibition on maintenance and repair of the relevant equipment includes a prohibition on the maintenance, update and repair of any embedded software that is incorporated into the equipment.

3. For the purposes of point (c) of paragraph 1, ‘telecommunication or internet monitoring or interception services’ means those services that provide, in particular using equipment, technology or software listed in Annex II, access to and delivery of a subject’s incoming and outgoing telecommunications and call-associated data for the purposes of its extraction, decoding, recording, processing, analysis or storing, or any other related activity.

Article5

1. The prohibitions in Articles 2(1) and 3(1) shall apply where equipment, technology or software not listed in Annexes I and II, are intended, in their entirety or in part, for use in connection with internal repression in Russia. Where the operator becomes aware of this, it shall immediately notify the competent authorities.

2. The prohibitions in Articles 2(1) and 3(1) shall not apply where the operator had no reason to suspect that the equipment, technology or software not listed in Annexes I and II are intended, in their entirety or in part, for use in connection with internal repression in Russia.

Article6

1. All funds and economic resources belonging to, owned, held or controlled by any natural or legal person, entity or body listed in Annex IV shall be frozen.

2. No funds or economic resources shall be made available, directly or indirectly, to or for the benefit of natural or legal persons, entities or bodies listed in Annex IV.

3. Annex IV shall include natural or legal persons, entities or bodies that:

a) are responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights or the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, or whose activities otherwise seriously undermine democracy or the rule of law in Russia;

b) provide financial, technical, or material support for, or are otherwise involved in, acts set out in point (a), including by planning, directing, ordering, assisting, preparing, facilitating, or encouraging such acts;

c) are associated with the natural or legal persons, entities or bodies referred to in point (a) or (b).

Article7

1. By way of derogation from Article 6(1) and (2), the competent authorities may authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources, or the making available of certain funds or economic resources, under such conditions as they deem appropriate, after having determined that the funds or economic resources concerned are:

a) necessary to satisfy the basic needs of natural or legal persons, entities or bodies listed in Annex IV, and dependent family members of such natural persons, including payments for foodstuffs, rent or mortgage, medicines and medical treatment, taxes, insurance premiums, and public utility charges;

b) intended exclusively for the payment of reasonable professional fees or the reimbursement of incurred expenses associated with the provision of legal services;

c) intended exclusively for the payment of fees or service charges for the routine holding or maintenance of frozen funds or economic resources;

d) necessary for extraordinary expenses, provided that the relevant competent authority has notified the competent authorities of the other Member States and the Commission of the grounds on which it considers that a specific authorisation should be granted, at least 2 weeks prior to the authorisation;

e) to be paid into or from an account of a diplomatic mission or consular post or an international organisation enjoying immunities in accordance with international law, insofar as such payments are intended to be used for official purposes of the diplomatic or consular mission or international organisation;

f) necessary for the functioning of diplomatic and consular representations of the Union and of the Member States or partner countries in Russia, including delegations, embassies and missions, or international organisations in Russia enjoying immunities in accordance with international law;

g) necessary for the provision of electronic communication services by Union telecommunication operators, for the provision of associated facilities and services necessary for the operation, maintenance and security of such electronic communication services, in Russia, in Ukraine, in the Union, between Russia and the Union, and between Ukraine and the Union, and for data centre services in the Union; or

h) necessary for the sale and transfer by 28 August 2024, or within 6 months from the date of listing in Annex IV, whichever is latest, of proprietary rights in a legal person, entity or body established in the Union where those proprietary rights are directly or indirectly owned by a natural or legal person, entity or body listed in Annex IV, and after having determined that the proceeds of such sale and transfer remain frozen.

2. The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisation granted under paragraph 1 within 2 weeks of the authorisation.

Article8

1. By way of derogation from Article 6(1) and (2), the competent authorities may authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources, or the making available of certain funds or economic resources, under such conditions as they deem appropriate, after having determined that the provision of such funds or economic resources is necessary to ensure the timely delivery of humanitarian assistance or to support other activities that support basic human needs.

2. In the absence of a negative decision, a request for information or a notification for additional time from the relevant competent authority within 5 working days of the date of receipt of a request for authorisation under paragraph 1, that authorisation shall be considered granted.

3. The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisation granted under this Article within 4 weeks of the authorisation.

Article9

1. By way of derogation from Article 6(1), the competent authorities may authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources, provided that the following conditions are met:

a) the funds or economic resources are the subject of an arbitral decision rendered prior to the date on which the natural or legal person, entity or body referred to in Article 6 was listed in Annex IV, or of a judicial or administrative decision rendered in the Union, or a judicial decision enforceable in the Member State concerned, prior to or after that date;

b) the funds or economic resources will be used exclusively to satisfy claims secured by such a decision or recognised as valid in such a decision, within the limits set by applicable laws and regulations governing the rights of persons having such claims;

c) the decision is not for the benefit of a natural or legal person, entity or body listed in Annex IV; and

d) recognising the decision is not contrary to public policy in the Member State concerned.

2. The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisation granted under paragraph 1 within 2 weeks of the authorisation.

Article10

1. By way of derogation from Article 6(1) and provided that a payment by a natural or legal person, entity or body listed in Annex IV is due under a contract or agreement that was concluded by, or an obligation that arose for, the natural or legal person, entity or body concerned, before the date on which that natural or legal person, entity or body was included in Annex IV, the competent authorities may authorise, under such conditions as they deem appropriate, the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources, provided that the competent authority concerned has determined that:

a) the funds or economic resources will be used for a payment by a natural or legal person, entity or body listed in Annex IV; and

b) the payment is not in breach of Article 6(2).

2. The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisation granted under paragraph 1 within 2 weeks of the authorisation.

Article11

1. Article 6(2) shall not prevent the crediting of frozen accounts by financial or credit institutions that receive funds transferred by third parties onto the account of a listed natural or legal person, entity or body, provided that any additions to such accounts will also be frozen. The financial or credit institution shall inform the relevant competent authority about any such transaction without delay.

2. Article 6(2) shall not apply to the addition to frozen accounts of:

a) interest or other earnings on those accounts;

b) payments due under contracts, agreements or obligations that were concluded or arose before the date on which the natural or legal person, entity or body referred to in Article 6 was included in Annex IV; or

c) payments due under judicial, administrative or arbitral decisions rendered in a Member State or enforceable in the Member State concerned,

provided that any such interest, other earnings and payments are frozen in accordance with Article 6(1).

Article12

1. Natural and legal persons, entities and bodies shall:

a) supply immediately any information which would facilitate compliance with this Regulation, such as information on accounts and amounts frozen in accordance with Article 6(1) or information held about funds and economic resources within Union territory belonging to, owned, held or controlled by natural or legal persons, entities or bodies listed in Annex IV and which have not been treated as frozen by the natural and legal persons, entities and bodies obliged to do so, to the competent authority of the Member State where they are resident or located, and transmit such information, directly or through the Member State, to the Commission; and

b) cooperate with the competent authority in any verification of the information referred to in point (a).

2. Paragraph 1 shall apply subject to national or other applicable rules regarding the confidentiality of information held by judicial authorities, and consistent with respect for the confidentiality of communications between lawyers and their clients guaranteed by Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. For that purpose, such communications include those relating to legal advice provided by other certified professionals who are authorised under national law to represent their clients in judicial proceedings, insofar as such legal advice is provided in connection with pending or prospective judicial proceedings.

3. Any additional information received directly by the Commission shall be made available to the Member States.

4. Any information provided or received in accordance with this Article shall be used only for the purposes for which it was provided or received.

5. The competent authorities, including enforcement authorities, customs authorities within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, competent authorities within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, as well as administrators of official registers wherein natural persons, legal persons, entities and bodies as well as immovable or movable property are registered, shall process and exchange without delay information, including personal data and, if necessary, the information referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, with other competent authorities of their Member State, of other Member States and the Commission, if such processing and exchange is necessary to carry out the tasks of the processing authority or the receiving authority under this Regulation, in particular when they detect instances of a breach or circumvention, or attempts at a breach or circumvention, of the prohibitions set out in this Regulation.

Article13

1. It shall be prohibited to participate, knowingly and intentionally, in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent the measures referred to in this Regulation.

2. Natural or legal persons, entities or bodies listed in Annex IV, shall:

a) report within 6 weeks from the date of listing in Annex IV funds or economic resources within the jurisdiction of a Member State belonging to, owned, held or controlled by them, to the competent authority of the Member State where those funds or economic resources are located; and

b) cooperate with the competent authority in any verification of such information.

3. Failure to comply with paragraph 2 of this Article shall be considered as participation, as referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent the measures referred to in Article 6.

4. The Member State concerned shall inform the Commission within 2 weeks of the information received pursuant to point (a) of paragraph 2.

5. Any information provided or received in accordance with this Article shall be used only for the purposes for which it was provided or received.

6. Any processing of personal data shall be carried out in accordance with this Regulation and with Regulations (EU) 2016/679 and (EU) 2018/1725 and only in so far as necessary for the application of this Regulation.

Article14

1. The freezing of funds and economic resources or the refusal to make funds or economic resources available, carried out in good faith on the basis that such action is in accordance with this Regulation, shall not give rise to liability of any kind on the part of the natural or legal person or entity or body implementing it, or its directors or employees, unless it is proved that the funds and economic resources were frozen or withheld as a result of negligence.

2. Actions by natural or legal persons, entities or bodies shall not give rise to any liability of any kind on their part if they did not know, and had no reasonable cause to suspect, that their actions would infringe the measures set out in this Regulation.

Article15

1. No claims in connection with any contract or transaction the performance of which has been affected, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, by the measures imposed under this Regulation, including claims for indemnity or any other claim of this type, such as a claim for compensation or a claim under a guarantee, in particular a claim for extension or payment of a bond, guarantee or indemnity, in particular a financial guarantee or financial indemnity, of whatever form, shall be satisfied, if they are made by:

a) natural or legal persons, entities or bodies listed in Annex IV;

b) any natural or legal person, entity or body acting through or on behalf of one of the natural or legal persons, entities or bodies referred to in point (a).

2. In any proceedings for the enforcement of a claim, the onus of proving that satisfying the claim is not prohibited by paragraph 1 shall be on the natural or legal person, entity or body seeking the enforcement of that claim.

3. This Article is without prejudice to the right of the natural or legal persons, entities and bodies referred to in paragraph 1 to judicial review of the legality of the non-performance of contractual obligations in accordance with this Regulation.

Article16

1. The Commission and Member States shall inform each other of the measures taken under this Regulation and share any other relevant information at their disposal in connection with this Regulation, in particular information in respect of:

a) funds frozen under Article 6 and authorisations granted under the derogations set out in this Regulation;

b) violation and enforcement problems and judgments handed down by national courts.

2. The Member States shall immediately inform each other and the Commission of any other relevant information at their disposal which might affect the effective implementation of this Regulation.

Article17

1. Where the Council decides to subject a natural or legal person, entity or body to the measures referred to in Article 2, it shall amend Annex IV accordingly.

2. The Council shall communicate a decision pursuant to paragraph 1, including the grounds for the listing, to the natural or legal person, entity or body concerned, either directly, if the address is known and if such communication can be effected, or through the publication of a notice, providing that natural or legal person, entity or body with an opportunity to submit observations.

3. Where observations are submitted, or where substantial new evidence is presented, the Council shall review the decision concerned and inform the natural or legal person, entity or body concerned accordingly.

4. The list in Annex IV shall be reviewed at regular intervals and at least every 12 months.

5. The Commission shall be empowered to amend Annex III on the basis of information supplied by Member States.

Article18

1. Annex IV shall include the grounds for the listing of natural or legal persons, entities or bodies concerned.

2. Annex IV shall contain, where available, the information necessary to identify the natural or legal persons, entities or bodies concerned. With regard to natural persons, such information may include: names and aliases; date and place of birth; nationality; passport and identity card numbers; gender; address, if known; and function or profession. With regard to legal persons, entities or bodies, such information may include names, place and date of registration, registration number and place of business.

Article19

1. Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Member States shall also provide for appropriate measures of confiscation of the proceeds of such infringements.

2. Member States shall notify the Commission of the rules referred to in paragraph 1 without delay after the entry into force of this Regulation and shall notify it of any subsequent amendment thereto.

Article20

1. The Council, the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (the ‘High Representative’) may process personal data in order to carry out their tasks under this Regulation. Those tasks include:

a) as regards the Council, preparing and making amendments to Annex IV;

b) as regards the High Representative, preparing amendments to Annex IV;

c) as regards the Commission:

i) adding the contents of Annex IV to the electronic, consolidated list of natural and legal persons, groups and entities subject to Union financial sanctions and to the interactive sanctions map, both of which are publicly available;

ii) processing information on the impact of the measures of this Regulation, such as the value of frozen funds and information on authorisations granted by the competent authorities.

2. The Council, the Commission and the High Representative shall process, where applicable, relevant data relating to criminal offences committed by listed natural persons, to criminal convictions of such persons or to security measures concerning such persons only to the extent that such processing is necessary for the preparation of Annex IV.

3. For the purposes of this Regulation, the Council, the Commission and the High Representative are designated as ‘controller’ within the meaning of Article 3, point 8, of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 in order to ensure that the natural persons concerned can exercise their rights under that Regulation.

Article21

1. Member States shall designate the competent authorities referred to in this Regulation and identify them on the websites listed in Annex III. Member States shall notify the Commission of any changes in the addresses of their websites listed in Annex III.

2. Member States shall notify the Commission of their competent authorities, including the contact details of those competent authorities, without delay after the entry into force of this Regulation, and shall notify it of any subsequent amendment thereto.

3. Where this Regulation sets out a requirement to notify, inform or otherwise communicate with the Commission, the address and other contact details to be used for such communication shall be those listed in Annex III.

Article22

Any information provided to or received in accordance with this Regulation shall be used only for the purposes for which it was provided or received.

Article23

This Regulation shall apply:

a) within the territory of the Union, including its airspace;

b) on board any aircraft or vessel under the jurisdiction of a Member State;

c) to any natural person inside or outside the territory of the Union who is a national of a Member State;

d) to any legal person, entity or body, inside or outside the territory of the Union, which is incorporated or constituted under the law of a Member State;

e) to any legal person, entity or body in respect of any business done in whole or in part within the Union.

Article24

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

ANNEX I

Firearms, ammunition and related accessories therefor, as follows:

1.1. Firearms not controlled by ML 1 and ML 2 of the Common Military List of the European Union (ft) (‘Common Military List’);

1.2. Ammunition specially designed for the firearms listed in item 1.1 and specially designed components therefor.

Simulators, other than those controlled by ML 14 of the Common Military List, for training in the use of firearms, and specially designed software therefor.

Bombs and grenades not controlled by the Common Military List.

Other explosives not controlled by the Common Military List and related substances as follows:

a) amatol;

b) nitroglycol;

c) picryl chloride.

Razor barbed wire.

Military knives, combat knives and bayonets with blade lengths in excess of 10 cm.

Production equipment specially designed for the items listed in this Annex.

ANNEX II

General Note

Notwithstanding the contents of this Annex, it shall not apply:

a) to equipment, technology or software which are specified in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council or the Common Military List;

b) software which is designed for installation by the user without further substantial support by the supplier and which is generally available to the public by being sold from stock at retail selling points, without restriction, by means of:

i) over-the-counter transactions;

ii) mail order transactions;

iii) electronic transactions; or

iv) telephone order transactions;

c) software which is in the public domain; or

d) where Article 2a of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 applies.

The sections A, B, C, D and E refer to the sections referred to in Regulation (EU) 2021/821.

A) List of equipment

Deep Packet Inspection equipment

Network Interception equipment including Interception Management Equipment (IMS) and Data Retention Link Intelligence equipment

Radio Frequency monitoring equipment

Network and Satellite jamming equipment

Remote Infection equipment

Speaker recognition/processing equipment

IMSI (4), MSISDN (5), IMEI (6), TMSI (7) interception and monitoring equipment

Tactical SMS (8) / GSM (9) / GPS (10) / GPRS (11) / UMTS (12) / CDMA (13)/PSTN (14) interception and monitoring equipment

DHCP (15) / SMTP (16), GTP (17) information interception and monitoring equipment

Pattern Recognition and Pattern Profiling equipment

Remote Forensics equipment

Semantic Processing Engine equipment

WEP and WPA code breaking equipment

Interception equipment for VoIP proprietary and standard protocol

B) Not used

C) Not used

D) ‘Software’ for the ‘development’, ‘production’ or ‘use’ of the equipment specified in A above.

E) ‘Technology’ for the ‘development’, ‘production’ or ‘use’ of the equipment specified in A above.

Equipment, technology and software under these sections fall within the scope of this Annex only to the extent that they fall within the general description ‘internet, telephone and satellite communications interception and monitoring systems’.

For the purpose of this Annex ‘monitoring’ means acquisition, extraction, decoding, recording, processing, analysis and archiving call content or network data.

Footnotes:

(4) IMSI stands for International Mobile Subscriber Identity. It is a unique identification code for each mobile telephony device, integrated in the SIM card and which allows identification of such SIM via GSM and UMTS networks.

(5) MSISDN stands for Mobile Subscriber Integrated Services Digital Network Number. It is a number uniquely identifying a subscription in a GSM or a UMTS mobile network. Simply put, it is the telephone number to the SIM card in a mobile phone and therefore it identifies a mobile subscriber as well as IMSI, but to route calls through him.

(6) IMEI stands for International Mobile Equipment Identity. It is a number, usually unique to identify GSM, WCDMA and IDEN mobile phones as well as some satellite phones. It is usually found printed inside the battery compartment of the phone. Interception (wiretapping) can be specified by its IMEI number as well as IMSI and MSISDN.

(7) TMSI stands for Temporary Mobile Subscriber Identity. It is the identity that is most commonly sent between the mobile and the network.

(8) SMS stands for Short Message System.

(9) GSM stands for Global System for Mobile Communications.

(10) GPS stands for Global Positioning System.

(11) GPRS stands for General Package Radio Service.

(12) UMTS stands for Universal Mobile Telecommunication System.

(13) CDMA stands for Code Division Multiple Access.

(14) PSTN stands for Public Switch Telephone Networks.

(15) DHCP stands for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol.

(16) SMTP stands for Simple Mail Transfer Protocol.

(17) GTP stands for GPRS Tunnelling Protocol.

ANNEX III

BELGIUM

https://diplomatie.belgium.be/en/policy/policy_areas/peace_and_security/sanctions

BULGARIA

https://www.mfa.bg/en/EU-sanctions

CZECHIA

www.financnianalytickyurad.cz/mezinarodni-sankce.html

DENMARK

https://um.dk/udenrigspolitik/sanktioner/ansvarlige-myndigheder

GERMANY

https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/DE/Artikel/Aussenwirtschaft/embargos-aussenwirtschaftsrecht.html

ESTONIA

https://vm.ee/sanktsioonid-ekspordi-ja-relvastuskontroll/rahvusvahelised-sanktsioonid

IRELAND

https://www.dfa.ie/our-role-policies/ireland-in-the-eu/eu-restrictive-measures/

GREECE

http://www.mfa.gr/en/foreign-policy/global-issues/international-sanctions.html

SPAIN

https://www.exteriores.gob.es/es/PoliticaExterior/Paginas/SancionesInternacionales.aspx

FRANCE

http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/autorites-sanctions/

CROATIA

https://mvep.gov.hr/vanjska-politika/medjunarodne-mjere-ogranicavanja/22955

ITALY

https://www.esteri.it/it/politica-estera-e-cooperazione-allo-sviluppo/politica_europea/misure_deroghe/

CYPRUS

https://mfa.gov.cy/themes/

LATVIA

https://www.fid.gov.lv/en

LITHUANIA

https://www.urm.lt/en/lithuania-in-the-region-and-the-world/lithuanias-security-policy/international-sanctions/997

LUXEMBOURG

https://maee.gouvernement.lu/fr/directions-du-ministere/affaires-europeennes/organisations-economiques-int/mesures-restrictives.html

HUNGARY

https://kormany.hu/kulgazdasagi-es-kulugyminiszterium/ensz-eu-szankcios-tajekoztato

MALTA

https://smb.gov.mt/

NETHERLANDS

https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/internationale-sancties

AUSTRIA

https://www.bmeia.gv.at/themen/aussenpolitik/europa/eu-sanktionen-nationale-behoerden/

POLAND

https://www.gov.pl/web/dyplomacja/sankcje-miedzynarodowe

https://www.gov.pl/web/diplomacy/international-sanctions

PORTUGAL

https://portaldiplomatico.mne.gov.pt/politica-externa/medidas-restritivas

ROMANIA

http://www.mae.ro/node/1548

SLOVENIA

http://www.mzz.gov.si/si/omejevalni_ukrepi

SLOVAKIA

https://www.mzv.sk/europske_zalezitosti/europske_politiky-sankcie_eu

FINLAND

https://um.fi/pakotteet

SWEDEN

https://www.regeringen.se/sanktioner

Address for notifications to the European Commission:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union (DG FISMA)

Rue de Spa 2/Spastraat 2

B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel,

E-mail: relex-sanctions@ec.europa.eu

ANNEX IV

Α. Natural persons

NameIdentifying informationStatement of ReasonsDate of listing
1.Nikolai Pavlovich DUBOVIK
(Николай Павлович ДУБОВИК)
Position: Judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
DOB: 23.4.1956
Nikolai Pavlovich Dubovik is a judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. In his position, he refused to consider Alexei Navalny’s cassation appeal against the verdict in the ‘slander of a veteran’ trial. As a result, he politically discredited Alexei Navalny before the 2020 constitutional referendum in Russia.
Therefore, Nikolai Pavlovich Dubovik is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia by violating freedom of opinion and expression.
27.5.2024
2.Eduard Borisovich ERDYNIEV
(Эдуард Борисович ЭРДЫНИЕВ)
Position: Judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
DOB: 16.3.1964
Eduard Borisovich Erdyniev is a judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. In his position, he refused to consider Alexei Navalny’s cassation appeal against the decision to replace the probation sentence with a fully-fledged sentence. Consequently, Alexei Navalny was pronounced guilty and, years later, was imprisoned in a high-security penal colony in order to prevent him from engaging in political activity.
Therefore, Eduard Borisovich Erdyniev is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia by violating freedom of opinion and expression.
27.5.2024
3.Andrey Vladimirovich FEDOROV
(Андрей Владимирович ФЕДОРОВ/ФЁДОРОВ)
Position: Deputy Chairman of the Kirovsky District Court of Tomsk
Judge of the Kirovsky District Court, city of Tomsk
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Andrey Vladimirovich Fedorov is a Russian judge working in the Kirovsky District Court, city of Tomsk. In his position, he rejected the complaint about the inaction of the officials of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation of the Tomsk Oblast regarding the poisoning of Alexei Navalny. His decision resulted in the imprisonment of Alexei Navalny.
He has been promoted to Deputy Chairman of the Kirovsky District Court of Tomsk.
Therefore, Andrey Vladimirovich Fedorov is responsible for activities which seriously undermine the rule of law in Russia.
27.5.2024
4.Ekaterina Vasilevna FEDOTOVA (NAUMOVA)
(Екатерина Васильевна ФЕДОТОВА (НАУМОВА))
Position: Representative of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the city of Khimki, Moscow Oblast
DOB: 6.11.1995
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Ekaterina Vasilevna Fedotova (Naumova) works in the Representation of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the city of Khimki, Moscow Oblast. In her position, she took part in the court meeting of 18 January 2021, organised at a police station, and demanded the extension of the illegal detention of Alexei Navalny by 30 days.
Therefore, Ekaterina Vasilevna Fedotova (Naumova) is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia by violating freedom of opinion and expression.
27.5.2024
5.Inna Alexandrovna FESENKO
(Инна Александровна ФЕСЕНКО)
Position: Judge of the Kirovsky District Court, city of Tomsk
DOB: 22.12.1968
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Inna Alexandrovna Fesenko is a Russian judge working in the Kirovsky District Court, city of Tomsk. In her position, she twice rejected complaints about the inaction of the Tomsk transport police regarding the poisoning of Alexei Navalny. Furthermore, she imposed a ban on certain actions on Ksenia Fadeeva, the former head of Navalny’s organisation headquarters in Tomsk.
Therefore, Inna Alexandrovna Fesenko is responsible for activities which seriously undermine the rule of law in Russia.
27.5.2024
6.Ekaterina Viktorovna GALYAUTDINOVA
(Екатерина Викторовна ГАЛЯУТДИНОВА)
Position: Judge of the Kirovsky District Court, city of Tomsk
DOB: 1969
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Ekaterina Viktorovna Galyautdinova is a Russian judge working in the Kirovsky District Court, city of Tomsk. In her position, she twice rejected complaints about the inaction of the Tomsk Transport Police regarding the investigation into the poisoning of Alexei Navalny.
Therefore, Ekaterina Viktorovna Galyautdinova is responsible for activities which seriously undermine the rule of law in Russia.
27.5.2024
7.Dmitry Evgenevich PANKRATOV
(Дмитрий Евгеньевич ПАНКРАТОВ)
Position: Senior Investigator of the Main Military Investigation Department of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, Colonel of Justice
DOB: 29.12.1967
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Dmitry Evgenevich Pankratov is a Senior Investigator of the Main Military Investigation Department of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation. In his position, he refused to initiate an investigation into the attempted murder of Alexei Navalny following Navalny’s was poisoning with the nerve agent Novichok.
Therefore, Dmitry Evgenevich Pankratov is responsible for activities which seriously undermine the rule of law in Russia.
27.5.2024
8.Evgeniy Borisovich RASTORGUEV
(Евгений Борисович РАСТОРГУЕВ)
Position: Judge of the 9th Arbitration Court of Appeal, Russia
DOB: 20.8.1970
POB: Vladimir Oblast, former USSR (now Russian Federation)
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Evgeniy Borisovich Rastorguev is a judge of the 9th Arbitration Court of Appeal, Russia. In his position, he upheld the claim of the ‘Druzhba Narodov’ company against Alexei Navalny. Alexei Navalny had claimed, in his investigation, that the company is engaged in a corruption scheme with the Russian National Guard (Rosgvardia).
Therefore, Evgeniy Borisovich Rastorguev is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia by violating freedom of opinion and expression, and for activities which seriously undermine the rule of law in Russia.
27.5.2024
9.Alexander Sergeevich ERMOLENKO
(Александр Сергеевич ЕРМОЛЕНКО)
Position: Head of branch No 15 of the federal governmental institution ‘Criminal Executive Inspectorate of the Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service in the City of Moscow’
DOB: 11.11.1993
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Alexander Sergeevich Ermolenko is the Head of branch No 15 of the federal governmental institution ‘Criminal Executive Inspectorate of the Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service in the City of Moscow’. In his position, he supported the transformation of Alexei Navalny’s suspended sentence into a custodial sentence during the court hearing in the Yves Rocher case.
Therefore, Alexander Sergeevich Ermolenko is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia by violating freedom of opinion and expression.
27.5.2024
10.Irina Geroldovna KIM
(Ирина Герольдовна КИМ)
Position: Judge of the Kovrov City Court of Vladimir Oblast
DOB: 14.8.1978
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Irina Geroldovna Kim is a judge of the Kovrov City Court of Vladimir Oblast.
As from 2022, she was directly involved in creating and maintaining torturous conditions for Alexei Navalny through repeatedly rejecting Alexei Navalny’s claims against the IK-6 penal colony regarding his treatment, where he was serving a sentence imposed as a result of politically motivated prosecution.
Therefore, Irina Geroldovna Kim is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia, including torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, arbitrary detentions, and the systematic violation of freedom of opinion and expression.
27.5.2024
11.Kirill Sergeevich NIKIFOROV
(Кирилл Сергеевич НИКИФОРОВ)
Position: Judge of the Regional Court of Vladimir Oblast
Former judge of the Kovrov City Court of Vladimir Oblast
DOB: 14.3.1992
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Kirill Sergeevich Nikiforov was a judge of the Kovrov City Court of Vladimir Oblast.
As from 2022, he was directly involved in creating and maintaining torturous conditions for Alexei Navalny through repeatedly rejecting Alexei Navalny’s claims against the IK-6 penal colony regarding his treatment, where he was serving a 12-year sentence imposed as a result of politically motivated prosecution.
Therefore, Kirill Sergeevich Nikiforov is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia, including torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, arbitrary detentions, and the systematic violation of freedom of opinion and expression.
He remains active in the judicial system in Russia and in December 2024 he was promoted to the position of judge of the Regional Court of Vladimir Oblast.
27.5.2024
12.Sergey Vladimirovich BLINOV
(Сергей Владимирович БЛИНОВ)
Position: Chairman of the Slobodskoy District Court of the Kirov Region
Former judge of the Leninsky District Court of Kirov
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
DOB: 1978
Sergey Vladimirovich Blinov was a judge of the Leninsky District Court of Kirov.
In 2013, he sentenced Alexei Navalny to 5 years and businessman Pyotr Ofitserov to 4 years in prison on embezzlement charges in the politically motivated trial of the ‘Kirovles case’. Additionally, they were fined 500000 rubles each.
Therefore, Sergey Vladimirovich Blinov is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia by violating freedom of opinion and expression.
He is currently serving as the chairman of the Slobodskoy District Court of the Kirov Region.
27.5.2024
13.Evgeny Vladimirovich BORISOV
(Евгений Владимирович БОРИСОВ)
Position: judge of the Nikulinsky District Court of Moscow
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
DOB: 13.3.1984
Evgeny Vladimirovich Borisov is a judge at the Nikulinsky District Court of Moscow.
In 2015, he accepted the claim of the Kirovles company to recover 16 million rubles from Alexei Navalny and two other defendants in the politically motivated ‘Kirovles case’.
Therefore, Evgeny Vladimirovich Borisov is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia by violating freedom of opinion and expression.
27.5.2024
14.Tatyana Stanislavovna DODONOVA
(Татьяна Станиславовна ДОДОНОВА)
Position: Judge of the Moscow City Court
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Tatyana Stanislavovna Dodonova is a judge at the Moscow City Court.
In 2014, she recognised the decision to place Alexei Navalny under house arrest as legal in the ‘Yves Rocher’ case. She has systematically been involved in cases against citizens of the Russian Federation who have opposed the political regime in Russia by sentencing arrested persons in connection with the 2019 Moscow Protests.
Therefore, Tatyana Stanislavovna Dodonova is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia by violating freedom of opinion and expression.
27.5.2024
15.Elena Sergeevna ASTAKHOVA
(Елена Сергеевна АСТАХОВА)
Position: Judge in the Golovinsky District Court of Moscow
DOB: 30.3.1978
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
ID NO. 45 01 525454
Taxpayer Personal Identification Number (ИНН):
7703204586
As judge of the Golovinsky District Court of Moscow, Elena Sergeevna Astakhova, sentenced Oleg Orlov, a prominent human rights defender and co-chairman of ‘Memorial’, to two years and six months in a general regime colony on politically motivated charges for speaking up against Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. Oleg Orlov, aged 70, is one of the most respected and longest-serving human rights defenders in Russia, one of the leaders of the 2022 Nobel Peace Prize-winning organisation Memorial Human Rights Defence Center (HRDC ‘Memorial’), which was liquidated as part of the systematic, wide-scale crackdown on the freedoms of expression, peaceful assembly, and association in Russia. Oleg Orlov was charged with and sentenced for allegedly ‘discrediting’ the Russian army after publishing an opinion piece in French media against Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.
Therefore, Elena Sergeevna Astakhova is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia by violating freedom of opinion and expression.
27.5.2024
16.Olesya Yurievna VOROBYOVA
(Олеся Юрьевна ВОРОБЬЕВА)
Position: State Prosecutor
DOB: 4.6.1981
As prosecutor in the politically motivated case against the prominent human rights defender Oleg Orlov, Olesya Yurievna Vorobyova asked to sentence Oleg Orlov to 2 years and 11 months in prison, arguing that Orlov’s article against Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine was motivated by ‘ideological hostility and hatred’. Oleg Orlov, aged 70, is one of the most respected and longest-serving human rights defenders in Russia, one of the leaders of the 2022 Nobel Peace Prize-winning organisation Memorial Human Rights Defence Center (HRDC ‘Memorial’), which was liquidated as part of the systematic, wide-scale crackdown on the freedoms of expression, peaceful assembly, and association in Russia. Oleg Orlov was charged with and sentenced for allegedly ‘discrediting’ the Russian army after publishing an opinion piece in French media against Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.
Therefore, Olesya Yurievna Vorobyova is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia by violating freedom of opinion and expression.
27.5.2024
17.Ilya Andreevich SAVCHENKO
(Илья Андреевич САВЧЕНКО)
Position: Investigator in the Investigative Department of Tver (Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation)
DOB: 18.6.1997
POB: Rtishchevo — Saratov Region, Russian Federation
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
As investigator in the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, Ilya Andreevich Savchenko was assigned Oleg Orlov’s case and contributed to Orlov’s indictment for having published an opinion piece against Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. Ilya Andreevich Savchenko established that Orlov had published the article guided by ‘ideological hostility against traditional Russian spiritual, moral and patriotic values’ and of hatred towards the social group ‘Russian militaries’.
Therefore, investigator Ilya Andreevich Savchenko is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia by violating freedom of opinion and expression.
27.5.2024
18.Oksana Vasilyevna DEMYASHEVA
(Оксана Васильевна ДЕМЯШЕВА)
Position: Deputy Chairperson of the Kalininsky District Court of Saint Petersburg
Former judge of the Vasileostrovsky District Court of Saint Petersburg
DOB: 10.3.1980
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
In her former position as judge of the Vasileostrovsky District Court of Saint Petersburg, Oksana Vasilyevna Demyasheva sentenced Alexandra Skochilenko, an artist, to seven years in prison on politically-motivated charges for spreading so-called ‘fake news’ about the Russian army. Skochilenko was arrested for replacing price tags at a supermarket with anti-war stickers. She became one of the first people charged under the newly passed criminal law outlawing so-called ‘fake news’ about the Russian army, her trial attracting wide public attention for the unprecedented pressure Skochilenko faced from the jail administration, the judge, and the prosecution.
Therefore, Oksana Vasilyevna Demyasheva is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia by violating freedom of opinion and expression.
She remains active in the judicial system in Russia and in June 2024 was appointed to the position of deputy chairperson of the Kalininsky District Court of Saint Petersburg.
27.5.2024
19.Alexander Yurievich GLADYSHEV
(Александр Юрьевич ГЛАДЫШЕВ)
Position: Prosecutor in the Department of State Prosecutors/ Saint Petersburg Prosecutor’s Office
DOB: 28.10.1994
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
As prosecutor of the Prosector’s Office in Saint Petersburg, Alexander Yurievich Gladyshev asked for an eight-year prison sentence for Alexandra Skochilenko, an artist, on politically motivated charges of spreading ‘fake news’ about the army, after she was arrested for replacing price tags at a supermarket with anti-war stickers. Skochilenko became one of the first persons charged under the newly passed criminal law outlawing so-called ‘fake news’ about the Russian army, her trial attracting wide public attention for the unprecedented pressure Skochilenko faced from the jail administration, the judge, and the prosecution.
Therefore, Alexander Yurievich Gladyshev is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia by violating freedom of opinion and expression.
27.5.2024
20.Olesya Anatoleyevna MENDELEYEVA
(Олеся Анатольевна МЕНДЕЛЕЕВА)
Position: judge of the Meshchansky Court of Moscow
DOB: 18.4.1981
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Olesya Mendeleyeva is a judge of the Meshchansky Court of Moscow. She sentenced Alexei Gorinov, local activist and municipal deputy, to 7 years imprisonment on politically-motivated charges pursuant to Article 207.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation on the dissemination of deliberately false information about the actions of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. The basis for the sentencing was Gorinov’s opinion expressed during a meeting of the Council of Deputies of the Krasnoselsky municipal district that a children’s drawing competition following Russia’s aggression against Ukraine looked like a ‘feast during the plague’. The trial was swift and, according to independent experts, served as a tool to intimidate other dissenting Russian citizens. This sentence was one of the first sentences of imprisonment imposed by a Russian judge under Article 207.1 which was not suspended. During the trial, Judge Mendeleyeva regularly sided with the prosecution and refused almost all requests of the defence and the defendant, including a request to release him from custody due to a deteriorating health condition. Judge Mendeleyeva fully satisfied the prosecution’s demands and sentenced Gorinov to 7 years imprisonment for non-violent action. That imprisonment has led to a significant deterioration of his health condition in a penal colony and to inadequate medical care.
Therefore, Olesya Mendeleyeva is responsible for serious violations of human rights, for the repression of democratic opposition, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
21.Olga Vladimirovna BALANDINA
(Ольга Владимировна БАЛАНДИНА)
Position: judge of the Sovetsky City Court of Kaliningrad Oblast
DOB: 5.6.1979
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Olga Balandina is a judge of the Sovetsky City Court of Kaliningrad Oblast. She sentenced Igor Baryshnikov, local activist, to 7,5 years imprisonment on politically-motivated charges, pursuant to Article 207.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, for publishing posts about Russia’s bombardment of Mariupol and atrocities in Bucha. During the trial, despite an attending physician testifying under oath that imprisonment might prove fatal for Baryshnikov due to cystotomy and a catheter in his abdomen, the judge refused to conduct a forensic examination of the defendant’s health. Consequently, imprisonment has led to inadequate treatment in the penal colony and to the deterioration of Igor Baryshnikov’s health condition. The judge also refused to allow Igor Baryshnikov to attend his mother’s funeral when she passed away 1,5 months after the sentencing.
Therefore, Olga Balandina is responsible for serious violations of human rights, for the repression of democratic opposition, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
22.Svetlana Fyodorovna ZHURAVLOVA
(Светлана Фёдоровна ЖУРАВЛЁВА)
Position: Senior Assistant of the Meshchansky Interdistrict Prosecutor’s Office
DOB: 8.7.1988
Nationality: Russian
Address: 1 Krasnoselsky per. 5/14, 107140 Moscow
Svetlana Zhuravlova is a Senior Assistant of the Meshchansky Interdistrict Prosecutor’s Office. She served as a prosecutor during Alexei Gorinov’s trial. Mr. Gorinov is a local activist and municipal deputy, who was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment on politically-motivated charges pursuant to Article 207.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation on the dissemination of deliberately false information about the actions of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. The basis for the sentencing was Mr. Gorinov’s opinion expressed during a meeting of the Council of Deputies of the Krasnoselsky municipal district that a children’s drawing competition following Russia’s aggression against Ukraine looked like a ‘feast during the plague’. The trial was swift and, according to independent experts, served as a tool to intimidate other dissenting Russian citizens. This sentence was on of the first sentences of imprisonment imposed by a Russian judge under Article 207.1 which was not suspended. Prosecutor Zhuravlova opposed all defence requests which could have improved the situation of the defendant or clarified the legal situation, including a request to release Mr. Gorinov from the glass cage in which he had to stay during the trial, a request to release him from custody due to a deteriorating health condition and a request to determine whether Article 207.1 complied with the Russian constitution. The judge sided with Prosecutor Zhuravlova on all of the above-mentioned requests. Prosecutor Zhuravlova demanded that the court sentence Mr. Gorinov to 7 years imprisonment for non-violent action, which was fully satisfied by the judge. That imprisonment has led to the significant deterioration of his health condition in the penal colony and to inadequate medical care.
Therefore, Svetlana Zhuravlova is responsible for serious violations of human rights, for the repression of democratic opposition, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
23.Alexey Sergeyevich KHARLAMOV
(Алексей Сергеевич ХАРЛАМОВ)
Position: Chairman of the Moscow Regional Court
DOB: 25.1.1975
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Alexey Kharlamov is the Chairman of the Moscow Regional Court who was previously a judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and a member of the Presidium of the Supreme Court.
In his position as member of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, in April 2018, he upheld the verdict against the opposition politician Alexei Navalny and his brother Oleg in the Yves Rocher case even though, in October 2017, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that Russia had violated the Navalny brothers’ right to a fair trial and punishment solely on the basis of the law. Consequently, Alexei Navalny was pronounced guilty and, as a result, imprisoned years later in a high-security penal colony in order to prevent him from taking part in political activities.
Therefore, Alexey Kharlamov is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia, including violating freedom of opinion and expression, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
24.Tatiana Alexandrovna MOLITVINA
(Татьяна Александровна МОЛИТВИНА)
Position: judge of the Moscow City Court
DOB: 28.3.1987
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Tatiana Molitvina is a judge of the Moscow City Court. Before her appointment to her present position, she was a judge of the Tverskoy District Court in the city of Moscow.
In her position as a judge of the Tverskoy District Court in the city of Moscow, she refused to accept a claim against the Prosecutor General, Yuri Chaika, and the President of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin, made by Alexei Navalny and the Anti-Corruption Foundation. Mr. Navalny’s claim was one of several attempts to sue Yuri Chaika for defamation following the release of an investigative film by Mr. Navalny’s Anti-Corruption Foundation that accused Chaika’s family members of involvement in illegal activities.
Therefore, Tatiana Molitvina is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia, including violating freedom of opinion and expression, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
25.Tatiana Anatolevna PETROVA
(Татьяна Анатольевна ПЕТРОВА)
Position: Deputy Chairwoman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
DOB: 27.7.1961
POB: Sychevka, Smolensk region
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Tatiana Petrova is the Deputy Chairwoman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.
In her position as member of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in April 2018, she upheld the verdict against the opposition politician Alexei Navalny and his brother Oleg in the Yves Rocher case even though, in October 2017, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that Russia had violated the Navalny brothers’ right to a fair trial and punishment. Consequently, Alexei Navalny was pronounced guilty and, as a result, was imprisoned years later in a high-security penal colony in order to prevent him from taking part in political activity.
Therefore, Tatiana Petrova is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia, including violating freedom of opinion and expression and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
26.Sergei Vladimirovich BOGDANOV
(Сергей Владимирович БОГДАНОВ)
Position: State Prosecutor of the Kirov oblast
DOB: Probably 1973
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Sergei Bogdanov is a state prosecutor of the Kirov oblast, Russia.
He represented the state prosecutor’s office in several court hearings against Alexei Navalny and Pyotr Ofitserov in the Kirovles case.
In July 2013, he requested 6 years imprisonment in a general regime penal colony for Mr. Navalny and 5 years for Mr. Ofitserov. Moreover, the state prosecution imposed an additional punishment on the defendants of a fine of 1 million RUB each.
In December 2016, the state prosecutor, Mr. Bogdanov presented a ‘similar indictment’ to the one filed in 2013. That happened despite the fact that, following the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) decision, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation overturned the sentences against Mr. Navalny and Mr. Ofitserov and sent the case back for retrial.
In February 2017, at the retrial of the Kirovles case, Prosecutor Bogdanov delivered a speech similar to the one he delivered in 2013 and only added a comment on the decisions of the ECHR and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation to overturn the sentencing of Mr. Navalny and Mr. Ofitserov. In his opinion, the reference to these decisions had no legal basis, since an independent trial was taking place and the ECHR verdict had no predetermined force. As a result, the court found Mr. Navalny and Mr. Ofitserov guilty and sentenced them to 5 and 4 years probation and a fine of 500000 RUB each.
Therefore, Sergey Bogdanov is responsible for serious human rights violations and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
27.Ekaterina Sergeevna FROLOVA
(Екатерина Сергеевна ФРОЛОВА)
Position: State prosecutor at the Prosecutor General’s Office
DOB: Around 1988
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Associated entities: Criminal Justice Department of the Moscow Prosecutor’s Office
Ekaterina Frolova is a state prosecutor at the Prosecutor General’s Office.
In 2020, she was promoted from the Central Administrative District to prosecutor of the Criminal Justice Department of the Moscow Prosecutor’s Office. In that position, she acted as the prosecutor in several proceedings against Alexei Navalny. In February 2021, she supported in court the replacement of Alexei Navalny’s suspended sentence with a term of actual imprisonment in the Yves Rocher case, despite his treatment at the Charité clinic, the expiration of his probationary period and the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights. In the same month, she asked the court to find Mr. Navalny guilty of slander against WWII veteran Ignat Artemenko. After her participation in the Navalny trial, Ekaterina Frolova was promoted to state prosecutor at the Prosecutor General’s Office.
Therefore, Ekaterina Frolova is responsible for serious human rights violations and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
28.Mikhail Yurevich KAZAKOV
(Михаил Юрьевич КАЗАКОВ)
Position: Judge of the Moscow City Court
DOB: 9.2.1976
Nationality: Russian
Gender: Male
Associated entities: Moscow City Court
Mikhail Kazakov is a Russian judge working in the Moscow City Court. In the proceedings to classify the Anti-Corruption Foundation, its legal entity, the Foundation for the Protection of Citizens’ Rights, and the Navalny headquarters as extremist organisations, he classified the materials in the case, preventing access to them for Alexei Navalny and his lawyers. In December 2021, Mr. Kazakov ruled to liquidate the Memorial Human Rights Center and its structural units.
Therefore, Mikhail Kazakov is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia, including violating freedom of association and freedom of opinion and expression, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
29.Alexander Alexandrovich KEMEROV
(Александр Александрович КЕМЕРОВ)
Position: Investigator at the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the Kemerovo region
DOB: 27.9.1984
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Alexander Kemerov is the investigator at the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the Kemerovo region, Kuzbass.
In that position, he was involved in the fabrication of the ‘extremism case’ against Alexei Navalny’s supporters, including Vadim Ostanin, the former head of the Navalny headquarters in Barnaul, as well as the fabricated fraud case against Alexei Navalny himself. Mr. Kemerov put pressure on the former employee of Navalny’s Anti-Corruption Foundation, Fyodor Gorozhanko, to testify against Alexei Navalny in order to incriminate him.
Therefore, Alexander Kemerov is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia, including torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, arbitrary arrests or detentions. He is also responsible for violations or abuses of freedom of opinion and expression, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
30.Valentin Valentinovich ERSHOV
(Валентин Валентинович ЕРШОВ)
Position: Deputy Chairman of the Moscow Regional Court
DOB: 8.4.1985
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Valentin Ershov is the Deputy Chairman of the Moscow Regional Court. In the past, he held the position of judge of the Presnensky District Court of Moscow, followed by the position of judge of the Moscow Regional Court.
In his position, in a politically motivated proceeding, he refused to process a lawsuit filed by Alexei Navalny and the Anti-Corruption Foundation against Prosecutor General Yuri Chaika and the editorial board of the electronic periodical ‘Ekho Moskvy’ for the protection of honor, dignity and business reputation.
Therefore, Valentin Ershov is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia, including violating freedom of opinion and expression, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
31.Ruslan Shavkyatovich NEVEROV
(Руслан Шавкатович НЕВЕРОВ)
Position: Investigator for especially important cases of the 1st control-zonal department of the procedural control and criminalistics department of the Main Military Investigative Department of the Investigative Committee, colonel of justice
DOB: 22.6.1979
Nationality: Russian
Phone number: +7-905-503-1997
Ruslan Neverov is the investigator for especially important cases of the 1st control-zonal department of the procedural control and criminalistics department of the Main Military Investigative Department of the Investigative Committee.
In his position, in March 2021 in the proceeding in the 235th Garrison Military Court, he requested the dismissal of a complaint about the inaction of the Main Military Investigative Department of the Investigative Committee regarding the poisoning of Alexei Navalny in 2020 by Novichok nerve agent. The Court agreed to reject Mr. Navalny’s claim.
Therefore, Ruslan Neverov is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia, including violating freedom of opinion and expression, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
32.Elena Alekseevna KOROBKOVA
(Елена Алексеевна КОРОБКОВА)
Position: Head of the Department for the Execution of Sentences not Related to the Isolation of Convicts from Society
DOB: 4.10.1970
Gender: female
Phone number: + 7-916-456-3230
Elena Korobkova is the head of the Department for the Execution of Sentences not Related to the Isolation of Convicts from Society. In 2020, Russian opposition leader and anti-corruption activist Alexei Navalny was poisoned with Novichok nerve agent and as a result was hospitalised in a serious condition in Berlin, Germany. Due to his condition, he was unable to attend the inspection ordered by the Federal Penitentiary Service (FSIN) of the Russian Federation. Following that event, on December 29, 2020, the Penitentiary Inspectorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia in Moscow made a submission to the court to cancel Mr. Navalny’s suspended sentence and execute the sentence imposed by the court. Elena Korobkova, as a representative of FSIN, demanded that the opposition activist’s suspended sentence be replaced with a custodial one.
Therefore, Elena Korobkova is responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia, including violating freedom of opinion and expression, for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
33.Margarita Nikolaevna KOTOVA
(Маргарита Николаевна КОТОВА)
Position: Judge of the Moscow City Court; former Judge of the Lefortovsky District Court of Moscow
DOB: 25.6.1984
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Address: Severodvinskaya Street, 11 Bldg. 1, Moscow, Russia, 127224
ITN: 771508948129
Phone number: + 7-926-288-0049
Margarita Kotova is a judge of the Moscow City Court. She was a judge of the Lefortovsky District Court of Moscow until 2022. In her former capacity, Judge Margarita Kotova found Alexei Navalny guilty in a court inside the maximum-security prison in Pokrov, 100 km east of Moscow where he is already serving a 2,5-year sentence for violating parole while in recovery from poisoning. She sentenced Alexei Navalny to 9 years imprisonment in a maximum-security colony with a fine of 1,2 million RUB on a trumped-up case of fraud and insult to the court. Alexei Navalny was also accused of fraud in relation to donations and of insulting a judge. She also extended pre-trial detention for a man under false motives for his pro-Ukrainian views in breach of his rights of defence.
Therefore, Margarita Kotova is responsible for serious violations of the right of defence and of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
34.Nadezhda Viktorovna TIKHONOVA
(Надежда Викторовна ТИХОНОВА)
Position: prosecutor of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation
DOB: 23.9.1974
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Nadezhda Tikhonova is a prosecutor of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation. Nadezhda Tikhonova asked a court to find Alexei Navalny guilty and to sentence him to 13 years imprisonment and 2 years of restriction of liberty, with a fine of 1,2 million RUB in a fabricated case of fraud for collecting donations for the work of the Anti-Corruption Foundation, and of contempt of court.
Therefore, Nadezhda Tikhonova is responsible for serious violations of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
35.Viktor Vladimirovich ROGOV
(Виктор Владимирович РОГОВ)
Position: Judge of the First Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction
DOB: 26.5.1965
Phone number: + 7-919-075-0024
Viktor Rogov is a judge at the First Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction. He upheld the sentences against politician Alexei Navalny and Daniel Kholodny, technical director of the YouTube channel ‘Navalny LIVE’. The Moscow City Court found Mr. Navalny guilty of creating an NGO that encroaches on the rights of citizens, financing extremism, creating an extremist community, involving minors in committing dangerous acts, and rehabilitating Nazism. Mr. Navalny was sentenced to 19 years imprisonment in a special regime colony and a fine of 500000 RUB. Mr. Kholodny was found guilty of financing extremist activities and participation in the activities of an extremist organisation and was sentenced to 8 years imprisonment in a general regime colony. After hearing the sentence, Mr. Navalny and Mr. Kholodny appealed the court’s decision at the First Court of Appeal in Moscow where judge Rogov refused their appeal and upheld the original decision. Mr. Rogov also upheld the decision sentencing opposition leader Vladimir Kara-Murza to 25 years imprisonment in a maximum security penal colony for charges of high treason, involvement in the activities of an undesirable group, and discrediting Russia’s armed forces.
Therefore, Viktor Rogov is responsible for serious violations of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
36.Denis Gennadievich POPOV
(Денис Геннадьевич ПОПОВ)
Position: Deputy Minister of the Russian Federation for Civil Defence, Emergencies, and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters
Former prosecutor of the city of Moscow
DOB: 12.1.1972
POB: Sverdlovsk
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
TIN: 770970517335
Denis Popov was the prosecutor of the city of Moscow. He was appointed by President Putin in 2019. Mr Popov was responsible for organising the state prosecution of Alexei Navalny and other opposition leaders and political activists in Moscow. He directly oversaw the recognition as extremist structures of organisations created by Alexei Navalny to support his political activities.
Therefore, Denis Popov is responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights or for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
He is currently a Deputy Minister of the Russian Federation for Civil Defence, Emergencies, and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters.
20.5.2025
37.Alina Vladimirovna IBRAGIMOVA
(Елена Владимировна ИБРАГИМОВА)
Position: Judge of the Kirovsky District Court of Saint Petersburg
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
As judge of the Kirovsky District Court of Saint-Petersburg, Alina Ibragimova sentenced Olga Smirnova, architect and political activist, to 1 month imprisonment on politically-motivated charges for spreading so-called ‘fake news’ about the Russian army. Olga Smirnova was arrested for publishing anti-war information on social media in a VK-group.
Therefore, Alina Ibragimova is responsible for serious violations of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
38.Olesya Igorevna KABOCHKINA
(Олеся Игоревна КАБОЧКИНА)
Position: Assistant Prosecutor of the Kalininsky District of Saint Petersburg
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
As assistant prosecutor of the Kalininsky District of Saint Petersburg, Olesya Kabochkina asked for a 7 year sentence of imprisonment for Ioann Kurmoyarov, blogger and priest, on politically-motivated charges for spreading so-called ‘fake news’ about the Russian army. Ioann Kurmoyarov was arrested for publishing video content on different social media platforms, where he criticised Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine on Christian pacifist and Orthodox theological bases. Olesya Kabochkina also works as prosecutor in the case of Evgeny Bestuzhev who has been detained for spreading so-called ‘fake news’ about the Russian army.
Therefore, Olesya Kabochkina is responsible for serious violations of human rights, including violating freedom of opinion and expression, for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
39.Ulyana Andreyevna KALUGINA
(Ульяна Андреевна КАЛУГИНА)
Position: Deputy Prosecutor of the Kalininsky District of Saint Petersburg
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
As deputy prosecutor of the Kalininsky District of Saint Petersburg, Ulyana Kalugina asked for compulsory medical measures for Viktoria Petrova, manager, on politically-motivated charges for spreading so-called ‘fake news’ about the Russian army. Ms Petrova was arrested for sharing anti-war YouTube-videos such as material from Maksim Kants, Aleksandr Nevzorov and the Ukrainian president Zelensky on her personal VK-page. Ulyana Kalugina also acted as prosecutor in the beginning of Ioann Kurmoyarov’s case, asking for a prison sentence for spreading so-called ‘fake news’ about the Russian army.
Therefore, Ulyana Kalugina is responsible for serious violations of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
40.Dmitry Alekseyevich MIHAILOV
(Дмитрий Алексеевич МИХАЙЛОВ)
Position: Judge of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Karelia
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
As judge of the Supreme Court of Republic of Karelia in Petrozavodsk, Dmitry Mihailov sentenced Sergey Drugov, blogger and activist, to 2 years of forced labour on politically-motivated charges for so-called ‘rehabilitation of Nazism’. Drugov was arrested for reposting anti-war information on his Telegram-channel, which was followed by approximately 67 people.
Therefore, Dmitry Mihailov is responsible for serious violations of human rights, including violating freedom of opinion and expression, for the repression of civil society, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
41.Natalya Vladimirovna PETROVA
(Наталья Владимировна ПЕТРОВА)
Position: Judge of the Kirovsky District Court of Saint Petersburg
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
As judge of the Kirovsky District Court of Saint Petersburg, Natalya Petrova sentenced Olga Smirnova, architect and political activist, to 6 years imprisonment on politically-motivated charges for spreading so-called ‘fake news’ about the Russian army. Olga Smirnova was arrested for publishing anti-war information on social media in a VK-group.
Therefore, Natalya Petrova is responsible for serious violations of human rights, for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
42.Gennadi Yuvinaliyevich PILEHIN
(Геннадий Ювиналиевич ПИЛЕХИН)
Position: Judge of the Kalininsky District Court of Saint Petersburg
DOB: 11.8.1972
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Address: st. Vosstaniya, 17, St. Petersburg, Russia, 191036 Apartment 2
As judge of the Kalininsky District Court of Saint Petersburg, Gennadi Pilehin sentenced Viktoria Petrova, manager, to compulsory medical measures on politically-motivated charges for spreading so-called ‘fake news’ about the Russian army. Ms Petrova was arrested for sharing anti-war YouTube-videos such as material from Maksim Kants, Aleksandr Nevzorov and the Ukrainian president Zelensky on her personal VK-page.
Therefore, Gennadi Pilehin is responsible for serious violations of human rights, for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
43.Ekaterina Feliksovna TIAMINA
(Екатерина Феликсовна ТЯМИНА)
Position: Judge of the Saint. Petersburg City Court
Former judge of the Kalininsky District Court of Saint Petersburg
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
As judge of the Kalininsky District Court of Saint Petersburg, Ekaterina Tiamina sentenced Ioann Kurmoyarov, blogger and priest, to 3 years imprisonment on politically-motivated charges for spreading so-called fake news about the Russian army. Ioann Kurmoyarov was arrested for publishing video content on different social media platforms, where he criticised Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine on Christian pacifist and Orthodox theological bases.
Ekaterina Tiamina also prolonged the incarceration of Viktoria Petrova, manager, on politically-motivated charges for spreading so-called ‘fake news’ about the Russian army. Ms Petrova was arrested for sharing anti-war YouTube-videos such as material from Maksim Kants, Aleksandr Nevzorov and the Ukrainian president Zelensky on her personal VK-page.
Therefore, Ekaterina Tiamina is responsible for serious violations of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, for the repression of civil society, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
She is currently serving as a judge of the Saint Petersburg City Court.
20.5.2025
44.Vyacheslav Vasilyevich VITUKHIN
(Вячеслав Васильевич ВИТУХИН)
Position: Prosecutor of the Prosecutor’s Office in Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
As prosecutor of the Prosecutor’s Office in Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, Vyacheslav Vitukhin asked for a 2 year sentence of imprisonment for Sergey Drugov, blogger and activist, on politically motivated charges for so-called ‘rehabilitation of Nazism’. Drugov was arrested for reposting anti-war information on his Telegram-channel, which was followed by approximately 67 people.
Therefore, Vyacheslav Vitukhin is responsible for serious violations of human rights, including violating freedom of opinion and expression, for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
45.Yulia Viacheslavovna SHILOVA
(Юлия Вячеславовна ШИЛОВА)
Position: Federal Judge at Court district Petushinsky in Russia
Nationality: Russian
Date of birth: 28.9.1990
Place of birth (town, country): Tulaga, Gorkovskaya Oblast, USSR (Currently: Nizhegorodskaya Oblast, Russian Federation)
Gender: female
Yulia Shilova is a federal judge at Court district Petushinsky in Russia. She was appointed in 2022 by decree of Vladimir Putin. Yulia Shilova was the appointed judge in a politically motivated case, namely the trial concerning the three lawyers of the late Alexei Navalny: V. Kobzev, I. Sergunin and A. Liptser. Those lawyers were arrested in October 2023 while the trials against Alexei Navalny were ongoing. The court proceedings against the lawyers took place behind closed doors from September 2024 until late December 2024. The trial was characterised by arbitrary and unfair proceedings authorised by Yulia Shilova, including hearings behind closed doors, and the making of a decision by her to sentence the lawyers of the late Alexei Navalny on arbitrary grounds. Judge Yulia Shilova has arbitrarily sentenced the three lawyers of Alexei Navalny based on their alleged ‘extremist activities’.
Yulia Shilova is therefore responsible for serious violations of the right to freedom of opinion and expression and the right to a fair trial, as well as for the repression of civil society, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
46.Andrei Valerievich KATKOV
(Андрей Валерьевич КАТКОВ)
Position: Head of the Department of State Prosecutors of the Vladimir Region
Nationality: Russian
Date of birth: 28.8.1979
Place of birth (town, country): Unknown
Gender: male
Andrei Katkov is Head of the Department of State Prosecutors of the Vladimir Region Prosecutor’s Office in Russia. Andrei Katkov was the prosecutor in the politically motivated case against the three lawyers of late Aleksei Navalny: V. Kobzev, I. Sergunin and A. Liptser. The lawyers were arrested in October 2023 while Navalny’s trial was still ongoing. The court proceedings against the lawyers took place behind closed doors from September 2024 until late December 2024.
As State Prosecutor, Andrei Katkov pleaded for maximum sentences for the lawyers based on arbitrary grounds, while basing his claims on information violating attorney-client privilege. The charges were politically motivated and focused on the ‘extremist community’ to which the lawyers of Alexei Navalny belonged, according to the reasoning of Andrei Katkov, belonged. The trial was characterised by arbitrary and unfair proceedings and the decision to sentence the lawyers of the late Alexei Navalny was made by the appointed judge on arbitrary grounds.
Andrei Katkov is therefore responsible for serious violations of the right to freedom of opinion and expression and the right to a fair trial, as well as for the repression of civil society, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
47.Natalia Vladimirovna BORISENKOVA
(Наталья Владимировна БОРИСЕНКОВА)
Position: Judge and Deputy Chairman at Nagatinsky District Court in Moscow, Russia
Nationality: Russian
Date of birth: 12.8.1979
Place of birth (town, country): Unknown, Russian Federation
Gender: female
Natalia Borisenkova is a judge and Deputy Chairman at Nagatinsky District Court in Moscow, Russia. She was appointed in 2012 by decree of President Vladimir Putin.
Natalia Borisenkova was the appointed judge in a politically motivated case, namely the trial concerning four journalists, K. Gabov, S. Karelin, A. Kriger and A. Favorskaya, who wrote about the late Alexei Navalny. The court proceedings against the journalists took place behind closed doors from August 2024 until 15 April 2025. Judge Natalia Borisenkova sentenced the four journalists to terms of imprisonment of 5.5 years for their alleged ‘involvement in an ‘extremist’ group’, namely the Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK) of late Alexei Navalny. The trial was characterised by arbitrary and unfair proceedings authorised by Natalia Borisenkova, with hearings taking place behind closed doors. The decision to sentence the journalists was made by Natalia Borisenkova on arbitrary grounds, invoking alleged ‘extremist activities’ which is an allegation used extensively in Russia against opposition groups.
Natalia Borisenkova is therefore responsible for serious violations of the right to freedom of opinion and expression and the right to a fair trial, for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and for activities seriously undermining democracy and the rule of law in Russia.
20.5.2025
48.Roman Viktorovich VLADIMIROV
(Роман Викторович ВЛАДИМИРОВ)
Position: Judge of the 2nd Western District Military Court, Russia
DOB:9.2.1987
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Roman Vladimirov, serving as a judge of the 2nd Western District Military Court, sentenced Alexei Gorinov, a former municipal deputy in the Krasnoselsky district of Moscow, to 3 years of imprisonment in a strict regime colony on politically motivated charges for expressing his opinion on Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.
Alexei Gorinov was sentenced under Article 205.2 of the Russian Criminal Code, which criminalises ‘justification of terrorism’, and is widely used to suppress freedom of opinion and expression. The conviction was based on comments made by Alexei Gorinov in a conversation with his cellmates, in which he merely recognised that Crimea was Ukrainian territory and that the Azov regiment was part of the Ukrainian army. The conversation was provoked by Alexei Gorinov’s cellmates and recorded by prison officials while he was serving his previous sentence of 6 years and 11 months for his anti-war statements at a public municipal meeting.
Therefore, Roman Vladimirov is responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights and for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition in Russia.
15.7.2025
49.Katerina Evgenievna KIRICHENKO
Yekaterina Evgenievna KIRICHENKO
(Катерина Евгеньевна КИРИЧЕНКО/ Екатерина Евгеньевна КИРИЧЕНКО)
Position: Judge of Presnensky District Court, Moscow
DOB:1.11.1986
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Katerina Kirichenko, serving as a judge of the Presnensky District Court in Moscow, was involved in several politically motivated prosecution cases, and was responsible for imposing arbitrary pre-trial detention and disproportionately harsh punishments.
In 2022, Katerina Kirichenko participated in the politically motivated prosecution of Alexei Gorinov, then a municipal deputy in the Krasnoselsky district of Moscow, for expressing his opinion on Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine during a public municipal meeting. She ordered that Alexei Gorinov be held in pre-trial detention, not resorting to any less restrictive measures such as house arrest or bail, despite his severe health issues, bad conditions in Russia’s detention centres, and despite the fact that he was the primary caregiver for his chronically ill wife. The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found Alexei Gorinov’s detention to be in violation of international human rights and therefore arbitrary. Katerina Kirichenko’s misuse of pre-trial detention in politically motivated cases is evident also in other instances. She issued detention warrants for several participants in the 2019 Moscow protests, despite their charges being of a minor nature. Moreover, in 2022, Katerina Kirichenko sentenced Daniil Tikhomirov to a disproportionately harsh punishment of one and a half years in a prison colony for assaulting a police officer, after he was stopped by police for waving an anti-war flag from his car.
Therefore, Katerina Kirichenko is responsible for serious human rights violations and the repression of civil society and democratic opposition in Russia.
15.7.2025
50.Larisa Tikhonovna MARTYNOVA
(Лариса Тихоновна МАРТЫНОВА)
Position: Judge of the Moscow City Court
DOB: 10.6.1964
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Larisa Martynova is a judge of the Moscow City Court. In 2022, Larisa Martynova, as a member of the appellate panel of judges of the Moscow City Court, sentenced Alexei Gorinov, then a municipal deputy in the Krasnoselsky district of Moscow, to 6 years and 11 months in a general regime colony on politically motivated charges for expressing his opinion on Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. She also agreed to close the court hearing to the public.
Alexei Gorinov was sentenced under Article 207.3 of the Russian Criminal Code, which criminalises the dissemination of so-called ‘false information’ about the Russian armed forces and is widely used to suppress freedom of opinion and expression. The conviction was based on Alexei Gorinov’s anti-war statements during a public municipal meeting. While serving his sentence, Alexei Gorinov was subjected to ill-treatment, including inadequate medical care despite severe health conditions, prolonged placement in isolation cells, and sleep deprivation. Larisa Martynova’s ruling therefore not only led to Alexei Gorinov’s unjust incarceration but also resulted in cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment or punishment.
Therefore, Larisa Martynova is responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights and for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition.
15.7.2025
51.Maksim Bronislavovich SOKOLOVSKIY
(Максим Брониславович СОКОЛОВСКИЙ)
Position: Former judge of the Moscow City Court, from 10 May 2023 Chairman of the Khoroshevsky District Court
DOB: 31.5.1977
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
As presiding judge of the appellate panel of judges of the Moscow City Court in 2022, Maksim Sokolovskiy sentenced Alexei Gorinov, then a municipal deputy in the Krasnoselsky district of Moscow, to 6 years and 11 months in a general regime colony on politically motivated charges for expressing his opinion on Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. He also ordered that the court hearing be closed to the public.
Alexei Gorinov was sentenced under Article 207.3 of the Russian Criminal Code, which criminalises the dissemination of so-called ‘false information’ about the Russian armed forces and is widely used to suppress freedom of opinion and expression. The conviction was based on Alexei Gorinov’s anti-war statements during a public municipal meeting. While serving his sentence, Alexei Gorinov was subjected to ill-treatment, including inadequate medical care despite severe health conditions, prolonged placement in isolation cells, and sleep deprivation. Maksim Sokolovskiy’s ruling therefore not only led to Alexei Gorinov’s unjust incarceration but also resulted in cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment or punishment.
Therefore, Maksim Sokolovskiy is responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights and for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition in Russia.
15.7.2025
52.Elena Leonidovna ZHURAVLEVA
(Елена Леонидовна ЖУРАВЛËВА)
Position: Judge of the Moscow City Court
DOB: 13.10.1976
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Elena Zhuravleva, as a member of the appellate panel of judges of the Moscow City Court in 2022, sentenced Alexei Gorinov, then a municipal deputy in the Krasnoselsky district of Moscow, to 6 years and 11 months in a general regime colony on politically motivated charges for expressing his opinion on Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. She also agreed to close the court hearing to the public.
Alexei Gorinov was sentenced under Article 207.3 of the Russian Criminal Code, which criminalises the dissemination of so-called ‘false information’ about the Russian armed forces and is widely used to suppress freedom of opinion and expression. The conviction was based on Alexei Gorinov’s anti-war statements during a public municipal meeting. While serving his sentence, Alexei Gorinov was subjected to ill-treatment, including inadequate medical care despite severe health conditions, prolonged placement in isolation cells, and sleep deprivation. Elena Zhuravleva’s ruling therefore not only led to Alexei Gorinov’s unjust incarceration but also resulted in cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment or punishment.
Therefore, Elena Zhuravleva is responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights and for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition in Russia.
15.7.2025
53.Andrey Viktorovich POLYAKOV
(Андрей Викторович ПОЛЯКОВ)
Position: Head of the Main Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation for the Rostov Oblast, Major General of Internal Service
DOB: 17.6.1970
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Passport number: series 1815 No 112026
INN (Russian Tax ID): 343517128461
Andrey Polyakov is the Head of the Main Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation for the Rostov Oblast, including pre-trial detention centre in Taganrog (SIZO-2), pre-trial detention centre 1 in Rostov-on-Don (SIZO-1), and colony No. 12 in Kamensk Shakhtinsky.
In his position, he is responsible for ensuring the protection of the rights of detainees and their safety and for the maintenance of law and order in the subordinate detention facilities he oversees. In the facilities under Polyakov’s authority, Ukrainian detainees, both civilian and military, as well as other detainees were regularly subjected to beatings by guards, suffered from severe food shortages, and had little to no access to medical care or legal assistance. During interrogations, they faced both psychological and physical coercion, including brutal beatings, electric shocks, and threats, with the aim of forcing them to confess to alleged war crimes, crimes of terrorism, or other offences. The documented instances of torture and ill-treatment include the case of the Ukrainian investigative journalist Victoria Volodymyrivna Roshchyna who died in September 2024 as a result of ill-treatment in Pre-Trial Detention Centre No. 2 of the Main Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service for the Rostov Oblast in Taganrog.
Therefore, Andrey Polyakov is responsible for serious human rights violations, namely torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, for the repression of civil society and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.11.2025
54.Andrey Vadimovich MIKHAILICHENKO
(Андрей Вадимович МИХАЙЛИЧЕНКО)
Position: Deputy Director for Security and Operational Work of Pre-Trial Detention Centre No. 2 of the Main Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service for the Rostov Oblast, Russian Federation
DOB: 31.3.1992
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Passport number: Series 6012 No 175625
INN (Russian Tax ID): 615490520223
Andrey Mikhailichenko serves as Deputy Director for Security and Operational Work of Pre-Trial Detention Centre No. 2 of the Main Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service for the Rostov Oblast (SIZO-2) in Taganrog, Russia. As a member of the management of SIZO-2 Mikhailichenko is responsible for widespread and systematic torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment of Ukrainian detainees, both civilian and military, as well as other detainees held in that facility.
Detainees in SIZO-2 are regularly subjected to beatings by guards, suffer from severe food shortages, and have little to no access to medical care or legal assistance. During interrogations, detainees face both psychological and physical coercion, including brutal beatings, electric shocks, and threats, with the aim of forcing them to confess to alleged war crimes, crimes of terrorism, or other offences all intended to crush resistance to Russia’s aggression against Ukraine. This treatment represents a serious violation or abuse of human rights and is a violation of the principle of rule of law. At least 15 detainees have died as a result of ill-treatment in the facility, including Ukrainian investigative journalist Victoria Volodymyrivna Roshchyna.
As Deputy Director for Security and Operational Work of SIZO-2, Andrey Mikhailichenko bears responsibility for the facility’s operations. He is therefore responsible for serious human rights violations, repression of civil society and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.11.2025
55.Andrey Sergeevich SAPITSKIY
(Андрей Сергеевич САПИЦКИЙ)
Position: Deputy Director for Personnel and Educational Work Issues of Pre-Trial Detention Centre No. 2 of the Main Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service for the Rostov Oblast, Russian Federation
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Andrey Sapitskiy, serves as Deputy Director for Personnel and Educational Work Issues of Pre-Trial Detention Centre No. 2 of the Main Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service for the Rostov Oblast (SIZO-2) in Taganrog, Russia. As a member of the management of SIZO-2, Sapitskiy is responsible for widespread and systematic torture and other cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment of Ukrainian detainees, both civilian and military, as well as other detainees held in that facility.
Detainees in SIZO-2 are regularly subjected to beatings by guards, suffer from severe food shortages, and have little to no access to medical care or legal assistance. During interrogations, detainees face both psychological and physical coercion, including brutal beatings, electric shocks, and threats, with the aim of forcing them to confess to alleged war crimes, crimes of terrorism, or other offences all intended to crush resistance to Russia’s aggression against Ukraine. This treatment represents a serious violation or abuse of human rights and is a violation of the principle of rule of law. At least 15 detainees have died as a result of ill-treatment in the facility, including Ukrainian investigative journalist Victoria Volodymyrivna Roshchyna.
As Deputy Director for Personnel and Educational Work Issues of SIZO-2, Andrey Sapitskiy bears responsibility for the facility’s operations. He is therefore responsible for serious human rights violations, repression of civil society, and activities seriously undermining of rule of law in Russia.
20.11.2025
56.Aleksandr Aleksandrovich SHTODA
(Александр Александрович ШТОДА)
Position: Director of Pre-Trial Detention Centre No. 2 of the Main Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service for the Rostov Oblast, Russian Federation
DOB: 19.11.1980
Nationality: Russian
Passport number: series 6001 No419633
INN (Russian Tax ID): 611903638423
Aleksander Shtoda, serves as Director of Pre-Trial Detention Centre No. 2 of the Main Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service for the Rostov Oblast (SIZO-2) in Taganrog, Russia. Shtoda is responsible for widespread and systematic torture and other cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment of Ukrainian detainees, both civilian and military, as well as other detainees held in the facility under his command.
Detainees in SIZO-2 are regularly subjected to beatings by guards, suffer from severe food shortages, and have little to no access to medical care or legal assistance. During interrogations, detainees face both psychological and physical coercion, including brutal beatings, electric shocks, and threats, with the aim of forcing them to confess to alleged war crimes, crimes of terrorism, or other offences all intended to crush resistance to Russia’s aggression against Ukraine. This treatment represents a serious violation or abuse of human rights and is a violation of the principle of rule of law. At least 15 detainees have died as a result of ill-treatment in the facility, including Ukrainian investigative journalist Victoria Volodymyrivna Roshchyna.
As Director of SIZO-2, Aleksander Shtoda holds authority over the facility’s operations. He is therefore responsible for serious human rights violations, repression of civil society, and activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.11.2025
57.Timur Savelevich VAKHRAMEEV
(Тимур Савельевич ВАХРАМЕЕВ)
Position: Judge of Basmanny District Court, Moscow; FormerMagistrate (Justice of the Peace) in Tagansky district of Moscow
DOB: 13.5.1990
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Timur Vakhrameev, a judge at the Basmanny District Court in Russia, has been involved in a number of politically motivated prosecution cases, imposing disproportionately harsh sentences on several individuals and extending the detention of others.
Judge Vakhrameev participated in the unjust and politically motivated prosecution of journalists Kirill Martynov and Dmitry Kolezev, as well as activist Lyusya Shtein, sentencing each of them to several years in prison in an effort to silence independent journalism and civil society in Russia. He also extended the pre-trial detention of lawyers Vadim Kobzev and Alexey Liptser, as well as journalists Konstantin Gabov and Sergei Karelin, in politically motivated cases related to crackdowns on individuals associated with the Anti-Corruption Foundation or Alexei Navalny himself. Additionally, he prolonged the pre-trial detention of Grigory Melkonyants, co-chairman of the Golos movement, Russia’s key independent election watchdog initiative, in an apparent attempt to exert additional pressure on public election monitoring in the country. In all of the aforementioned cases, controversial articles of the Russian Criminal Code on undesirable organisations, discrediting the Russian army, or extremism were applied.
Moreover, earlier in 2023, while serving as a justice of the peace in Moscow’s Tagansky District, Timur Vakhrameev also played an active role in penalising international companies such as Wikimedia and Google for failing to remove factual information about Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.
Timur Vakhrameev is therefore responsible for serious human rights violations, the repression of civil society and democratic opposition and activities seriously undermining democracy and the rule of law in Russia.
20.11.2025
58.Artemy Alexeevich TELMINOV
(Артемий Алексеевич ТЕЛЬМИНОВ)
Position: Investigator of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation
DOB: 30.12.1994
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Artemy Telminov serves as an Investigator of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, and has been involved in a number of politically motivated prosecutions of individuals associated with Alexei Navalny, including, journalists Antonina Favorskaya, Olga Komleva, Konstantin Gabov, and Sergey Karelin, as well as lawyers Vadim Kobzev, Alexei Liptser, and Igor Sergunin. By advocating for the imposition or extension of their detention, he has actively contributed to the Russian regime’s efforts to suppress dissent within the country.
All of the individuals mentioned above were investigated and subsequently charged with participation in an extremist community or organisation, or with involvement in its activities. In reality, these charges were based solely on their lawful actions while associated with Alexei Navalny and his Anti-Corruption Foundation. The misuse of legislation related to terrorism and extremism to suppress political opposition and peaceful civil society efforts linked to Navalny has become a widespread practice in Russia. All of the aforementioned cases exhibit a consistent pattern of politically motivated prosecution, including prolonged pre-trial detention and, in some instances, closed court proceedings.
Artemy Telminov’s active role in orchestrating the unjust prosecution of Antonina Favorskaya, Olga Komleva, Konstantin Gabov, Sergey Karelin, Vadim Kobzev, Alexei Liptser, and Igor Sergunin constitutes a grave violation of human rights. Therefore, he is directly responsible for serious human rights abuses and for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition in Russia.
20.11.2025
59.Boris Ashirbaevich KOZHEVNIKOV
(Борис Аширбаевич КОЖЕВНИКОВ)
Position: Deputy Chairman of the Appellate Military Court of Russia
DOB: 31.8.1964
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Boris Kozhevnikov is a Deputy Chairman of the Appellate Military Court of Russia.
As deputy chairman of the Appellate Military Court of Russia, Boris Kozhevnikov rejected the appeal of Alexei Gorinov, a former municipal deputy in the Krasnoselsky district of Moscow, against a politically motivated sentence. In a procedurally flawed trial, Alexei Gorinov was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment in a strict regime penal colony under Article 205.2 of the Russian Criminal Code for ‘justification of terrorism’. Alexei Gorinov’s sentence was based on statements he made in a conversation with his cellmates in which he allegedly recognised that Crimea was Ukrainian territory and the Azov regiment was part of the Ukrainian army. Furthermore, Kozhevnikov upheld the sentences of imprisonment for Andrei Boyarshinov, Ibragim Orudzhev, Alexei Nuriev and Roman Nasryev on politically motivated charges in alleged terrorism related cases.
Therefore, Boris Kozhevnikov is responsible for serious violations of human rights, including violating freedom of opinion and expression, for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and for activities which seriously undermine the rule of law in Russia.
20.11.2025
60.Maxim Alexandrovich PANIN
(Максим Александрович ПАНИН)
Position: Judge of the Appellate Military Court of Russia (Judicial Panel for Criminal Cases)
DOB: 22.2.1982
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Maksim Panin is a judge of the Appellate Military Court of Russia.
As a member of the panel of judges of the Appellate Military Court of Russia, Maksim Panin rejected the appeal of Alexei Gorinov, a former municipal deputy in the Krasnoselsky district of Moscow, against a politically motivated sentence. In a procedurally flawed trial, Alexei Gorinov was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment in a strict regime colony under Article 205.2 of the Russian Criminal Code for ‘justification of terrorism’. Alexei Gorinov’s sentence was based on statements he made in a conversation with his cellmates in which he allegedly recognised that Crimea was Ukrainian territory and the Azov regiment was part of the Ukrainian army.
Furthermore, Panin participated in politically motivated prosecutions of other individuals. As a member of the appellate panel, he upheld the conviction of Elena Kotenochkina, who was accused of ‘justifying terrorism’ through a social media post and sentenced, in absentia, to six years and eleven months in a penal colony. Panin also confirmed the extension of the detention period in the cases of Polina Yevtushenko, prosecuted for spreading ‘fake news’ about the Russian army and ‘rehabilitation of Nazism’, and Enver Krosh, Rinat Aliev and Vilen Temeryanov, Crimean Tatars prosecuted for their alleged involvement in an Islamic group banned in Russia.
Therefore, Maksim Panin is responsible for serious violations of human rights, including violating freedom of opinion and expression, for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and for activities which seriously undermine the rule of law in Russia.
20.11.2025
61.Marina Viktorovna USHAKOVA
(Марина Викторовна УШАКОВА)
Position: Judge of the Appellate Military Court of Russia (Judicial Panel for Criminal Cases)
DOB: 2.5.1979
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Marina Ushakova is a judge of the Appellate Military Court of Russia.
As a member of the appellate panel of judges of the Appellate Military Court of Russia, Marina Ushakova rejected the appeal of Alexei Gorinov, a former municipal deputy in the Krasnoselsky district of Moscow, against a politically motivated sentence. In a procedurally flawed trial, Alexei. Gorinov was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment in a strict regime colony under Article 205.2 of the Russian Criminal Code for ‘justification of terrorism’. Alexei Gorinov’s sentence was based on statements he made in a conversation with his cellmates in which he allegedly recognised that Crimea was Ukrainian territory and the Azov regiment was part of the Ukrainian army. Furthermore, Ushakova upheld the convictions of Nikita Tushkanov, Daniil Bondarenko and Stanislav Shevchenko, based on politically motivated charges of ‘justifying terrorism’ in their statements on social media or in private conversations regarding, in particular, the Crimean Bridge explosion.
Therefore, Marina Ushakova is responsible for serious violations of human rights, including violating freedom of opinion and expression, for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and for activities which seriously undermine the rule of law in Russia.
20.11.2025
62.Svetlana Sergeevna RYGALOVA
(Светлана Сергеевна РЫГАЛОВА)
Position: Prosecutor of the Criminal Judicial Department of the Prosecutor’s Office of Vladimir Region, Junior Justice Counsellor
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Svetlana Rygalova, serving as a prosecutor of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Vladimir Region, participated in the politically motivated prosecution of Alexei Gorinov, a former municipal deputy in the Krasnoselsky district of Moscow, for expressing his opinion related to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.
Prosecutor Rygalova approved the indictment in a criminal case and led the prosecution of Alexei Gorinov under Article 205.2 of the Russian Criminal Code for ‘justification of terrorism’, proposing that he be sentenced to three and a half years of imprisonment. The prosecution’s case was based on statements Gorinov made in a conversation with his cellmates in which he allegedely recognised that Crimea was Ukrainian territory and the Azov regiment was part of the Ukrainian army. On the basis of Rygalova’s indictment, Gorinov was sentenced to three years of imprisonment.
Therefore, Svetlana Rygalova is responsible for serious violations of human rights, including violating freedom of opinion and expression, for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
20.11.2025
63.Dmitry Sergeyevich GORDEEV
(Дмитрий Сергеевич ГОРДЕЕВ)
Position: Judge of the Moscow City Court
DOB: 9.8.1983
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Dmitry Gordeev is a judge of the Moscow City Court and formerly of the Tverskoy District Court in the city of Moscow.
Dmitry Gordeev has repeatedly issued politically motivated rulings against opposition figures and human rights defenders. His judicial conduct demonstrates systematic disregard for fundamental standards of impartial justice. He routinely refuses to examine exculpatory evidence, including video recordings contradicting police claims, and consistently accepts unverified or copied police reports from his former colleagues, revealing bias, conflict of interest and a lack of judicial independence. His rulings form a recognisable, politically driven pattern aligned with the interests of the Russian security services. His role has been described as part of a ‘repressive machine’ that has to operate without failures, underscoring his central function in implementing politically motivated prosecutions.
Through his repeated actions, Dmitry Gordeev has repressed civil society, democratic opposition and human rights defenders, undermined judicial independence and the rule of law, and actively facilitated politically motivated prosecutions. His decisions materially support and enable the continued operation of Russia’s repressive State apparatus.
Therefore, Dmitry Gordeev is responsible for serious violations of human rights, the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and activities that seriously undermine democracy and the rule of law in Russia.
22.12.2025
64.Lyudmila BALANDINA
(Людмила БАЛАНДИНА)
Position: Prosecutor
DOB: 16.11.1984
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Lyudmila Balandina is a prosecutor who has played a key role in several high-profile cases characterised by serious violations of human rights and repression of individuals critical of the Russian authorities or supportive of Ukraine.
Lyudmila Balandina has systematically abused her position as a State prosecutor to pursue politically motivated charges, employ ideological rhetoric aligned with Kremlin propaganda and seek excessive punishments for acts of peaceful expression. Her conduct demonstrates an ongoing and deliberate effort to repress civil society, silence dissent and legitimise State narratives that equate criticism of the Russian Government or support for Ukraine with extremism or terrorism.
By initiating and sustaining such prosecutions, Lyudmila Balandina has been directly involved in serious violations and abuses of human rights, including violations of the freedom of expression, the right to a fair trial and the prohibition of arbitrary prosecution, as protected under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights.
Lyudmila Balandina’s activities seriously undermine democracy and the rule of law in Russia, by turning the judicial system into a tool of political persecution and contributing to the broader pattern of State repression against journalists, cultural figures and opposition voices.
Therefore, Lyudmila Balandina is responsible for serious violations of human rights, the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and activities that seriously undermine democracy and the rule of law in Russia.
22.12.2025
65.Aleksei Vasilyevich VALIZER
(Russian: Алексей Васильевич ВАЛИЗЕР)
Position: head of Penal Colony 10 UFSIN in Altai Krai
DOB: 7.9.1982
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Aleksei Valizer is the head of Penal Colony 10 UFSIN in Altai Krai. Aleksei Gorinov is a prisoner who has been held in that facility since 17 July 2025. Aleksei Gorinov was sentenced to six years and 11 months of imprisonment for public dissemination of ‘knowingly false information’ about the Russian armed forces and afterwards to three years of imprisonment for ‘public justification of terrorism’. The Memorial ‘Support for Political Prisoners’ programme recognised him as a political prisoner. While serving a sentence in the penal colony, Gorinov was immediately put in a solitary confinement cell, where he was deprived of medical treatment despite being previously diagnosed with symptoms of tuberculosis. That punishment was automatically extended several times for far-fetched reasons, such as ‘not holding hands behind back’ and ‘placing glasses and letters on the bedside table’. Valizer, as the head of the penal colony, is responsible for that facility’s policy towards Gorinov.
Therefore, Aleksei Valizer is responsible for serious violations and abuses of human rights and for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition.
23.2.2026
66.Anton Vladimirovich RYCHAR
(Russian: Антон Владимирович РЫЧАР)
Position: head of Pre-trial Detention Centre 1 UFSIN in the Jewish Autonomous Oblast
DOB: 9.1.1985
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Anton Rychar is the head of Pre-trial Detention Centre 1 UFSIN in the Jewish Autonomous Oblast. Pavel Kushnir, a musician with an anti-war stance, was held in that facility from May 2024 until his death on 28 July 2025. He was charged with ‘public calls for terrorism’ for his statements against the Russian authorities. During his imprisonment, he went on a dry hunger strike. According to witnesses’ testimonies, he lost approximately 10 kilograms and looked like ‘a skeleton’. Other sources stated that Kushnir was beaten in custody by his fellow inmates. A witness also saw a bruise on Kushnir’s face. Anton Rychar is responsible for the conditions of Kushnir’s incarceration, which led to his death due to insufficient medical treatment.
Therefore, Anton Rychar is responsible for serious violations and abuses of human rights and for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition.
23.2.2026
67.Maksim Aleksandrovich PRILEPSKY
(Russian: Максим Александрович ПРИЛЕПСКИЙ)
Position: head of Penal Colony 5 UFSIN in the Oryol Oblast
DOB: 30.10.1976
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Maksim Prilepsky is the head of Penal Colony 5 UFSIN in the Oryol Oblast. Mikhail Kriger is a prisoner held in that facility. On 17 May 2023, he was sentenced to seven years of imprisonment on politically motivated charges of ‘public justification of terrorism’ and ‘public incitement to hatred and enmity against a social group with the threat of violence’. The Memorial ‘Support for Political Prisoners’ programme recognised him as a political prisoner. While serving his sentence in the penal colony, Kriger was repeatedly put in a solitary confinement in harsh conditions for allegedly being threatened by other inmates. However, according to human rights defenders and Kriger, it was a far-fetched reason and the isolation was motivated by the political nature of his case. Kriger was put in solitary confinement for a period of 90 days and was not allowed to have visits from relatives or to receive letters from outside the penal colony. As a consequence, Kriger went on a hunger strike for 51 days. Prilepsky, as the head of the penal colony, is responsible for that facility’s policy towards Kriger.
Therefore, Maksim Prilepsky is responsible for serious violations and abuses of human rights and for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition.
23.2.2026
68.Vyacheslav Nikolaevich PISKLOV
(Russian: Вячеслав Николаевич ПИСКЛОВ)
Position: head of Penal Colony 9 UFSIN in Altai Krai
DOB: 15.8.1985
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Vyacheslav Pisklov is the head of Penal Colony 9 UFSIN in Altai Krai. Maria Ponomarenko is a prisoner who is being held in that facility. On 15 February 2023, she was sentenced to six years of imprisonment on the charge of spreading ‘false information’ about the Russian armed forces. In March 2025, while she was incarcerated, she was sentenced to 22 additional months in prison for allegedly using violence against prison staff. The Memorial ‘Support for Political Prisoners’ programme recognised her as a political prisoner. While serving a sentence in the penal colony, Ponomarenko was mistreated, including by being repeatedly put in a solitary confinement in harsh conditions for far-fetched reasons and being deprived of medical treatment. This has led to her breakdown and subsequently three suicide attempts, two of which took place in the penal colony. Pisklov, as the head of the penal colony, is responsible for that facility’s policy towards Ponomarenko.
Therefore, Vyacheslav Pisklov is responsible for serious violations and abuses of human rights and for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition.
23.2.2026
69.Sergei Vladimirovich FILICHEV
(Russian: Сергей Bладимирович ФИЛИЧЕВ)
Position: prosecutor of the Lomonosovsky District Court of Saint-Petersburg
DOB: 1984
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
As a prosecutor of the Lomonosovsky District Court of Saint-Petersburg, Sergei Filichev requested a two-and-a-half-year prison sentence for Dmitry Nikolaevich Skurikhin, an entrepreneur and local politician, on the politically motivated charge of ‘discrediting’ the Russian armed forces. Skurikhin had repeatedly expressed his anti-war and anti-mobilisation sentiments in public.
Therefore, Sergei Filichev is responsible for serious violations of human rights, in particular the right to freedom of opinion and expression, and for the repression of democratic opposition in Russia.
23.2.2026
70.EVA Alexandrovna GIUNTER
(Russian: Ева Александровна ГЮНТЕР)
Position: judge of the Moskovsky District Court of Saint-Petersburg
DOB: 17.12.1974
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Internal passport number: 3299205055
Date of issue: 24.2.2000
As the judge of the Moskovsky District Court of Saint-Petersburg, EVA Giunter sentenced Oleg Vasilievich Belousov, a widower with a dependent adult son with a mental disability, to five-and-a-half years in prison on politically motivated charges of spreading ‘false information’ about the Russian armed forces and for ‘public calls for extremism’. Giunter also prohibited Belousov from posting material on telecommunication networks, including the internet, for four years. Oleg Belousov was arrested on 28 June 2022 for publishing anti-war material on the VK social media platform.
Therefore, EVA Giunter is responsible for serious violations of human rights, in particular the right to freedom of opinion and expression, and for the repression of civil society in Russia.
23.2.2026
71.Ilya Alekseevich PLESHKOV
(Russian: Илья Алексеевич ПЛЕШКОВ)
Position: senior investigator of the Moskovsky District of Saint-Petersburg
DOB: 1993
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
As a senior investigator of the Investigation Department for the Moskovsky District of Saint-Petersburg, Ilya Pleshkov led the investigation on Oleg Belousov, a widower with a dependent adult son with a mental disability, on the politically motivated charge of spreading ‘false information’ about the Russian armed forces. Oleg Belousov was arrested on 28 June 2022 for publishing anti-war material on the VK social media platform. Belousov was sentenced to five-and-a-half years in prison and given a four-year ban from posting material on telecommunication channels.
Therefore, Ilya Pleshkov is responsible for serious violations of human rights, in particular the right to freedom of opinion and expression, and for the repression of civil society in Russia.
23.2.2026
72.Andrey Pavlovich SHIBAKOV
(Russian: Андрей Павлович ШИбАКОВ)
Position: judge of the Lomonosovsky District Court of Leningrad region, Saint-Petersburg
DOB: 30.12.1969
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Internal passport number: 4001793958
As the judge of the Lomonosovsky District Court of Saint-Petersburg, Andrey Shibakov sentenced Dmitry Nikolaevich Skurikhin, an entrepreneur and a local politician, to one-and-a-half years in prison on the politically motivated charge of ‘discrediting’ the Russian armed forces. Skurikhin had repeatedly expressed his anti-war and anti-mobilisation sentiments in public.
Therefore, Andrey Shibakov is responsible for serious violations of human rights, in particular the right to freedom of opinion and expression, and for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition in Russia.
23.2.2026
73.Vasily Anatolevich KALASHNIKOV
(Russian: Василий Анатольевич КАЛАШНИКОВ)
Position: Operative in the Forensic Science Institute of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB) Special Equipment Center
DOB: 11.1.1975
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Vasily Kalashnikov, an operative in the Forensic Science Institute of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB) Special Equipment Center and an expert in gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, was a pivotal figure in the FSB’s team effort to erase all forensic evidence of the poisoning of Alexei Navalny. Vasily Kalashnikov’s technical expertise was essential to ensuring that no detectable chemical traces remained on Navalny’s belongings.
Therefore, Vasily Kalashnikov is responsible for providing technical and material support for the repression of democratic opposition by assisting and facilitating such acts.
15.6.2026
74.Mikhail Mikhailovich SHVETS
(Russian: Михаил Михайлович ШВЕЦ)
a.k.a. Mikhail STEPANOV
(Russian: Михаил СТЕПАНОВ)
Position: Operative in the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB) Special Operations Center
DOB: 3.5.1977 (15.4.1974 for the alias Mikhail Stepanov)
POB: Russian SSR (now Russian Federation)
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Mikhail Shvets is a high-ranking operative in the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB) Special Operations Center. Investigations into the poisoning of Alexei Navalny identify Mikhail Shvets as a core member of the alleged ‘poisoning team’, noting his use of the alias ‘Mikhail Stepanov’ to facilitate the covert deployment of a nerve agent. Mikhail Shvets assisted the assassination attempt by providing logistical and surveillance support.
Therefore, Mikhail Shvets is responsible for providing material support for the repression of democratic opposition by assisting and facilitating such acts.
15.6.2026
75.Alexei Leonidovich KRIVOSHCHEKOV
(Russian: Алексей Леонидович КРИВОЩЕКОВ)
Position: Officer of the Service for the Protection of the Constitutional Order and Countering Terrorism of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB)
DOB: 11.4.1979
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Alexei Krivoshchekov is an officer of the Service for the Protection of the Constitutional Order and Countering Terrorism of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB) since 2008. In that position, he was part of a group of FSB officers operating under false identities, with the purpose of keeping Alexei Navalny under surveillance during several of his trips within Russia from 2017 to 2019. Alexei Navalny was being monitored by Alexei Krivoshchekov and two other officers during the first attempt to poison him in early 2017, while travelling to Kirov.
Therefore, Alexei Krivoshchekov is responsible for providing technical and material support for the repression of democratic opposition by assisting and facilitating such acts.
15.6.2026
76.Valery Nikolaevich SUKHAREV
(Russian: Валерий Николаевич СУХАРЕВ)
a.k.a. Nikolai Aleksandrovich GOROKHOV
(Russian: Николай Александрович ГОРОХОВ)
Position: Senior Officer of the Service for the Protection of the Constitutional Order and Countering Terrorism of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB)
DOB: 2.4.1956
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Valery Sukharev is a senior officer of the Service for the Protection of the Constitutional Order and Countering Terrorism of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB). In that position, he was part of a group of FSB officers operating under false identities, with the purpose of keeping Alexei Navalny under surveillance during several of his trips within Russia from 2017 to 2019. Alexei Navalny was being monitored by Valery Sukharev and two other officers during the first attempt to poison him in early 2017, while travelling to Kirov.
Therefore, Valery Sukharev is responsible for providing technical and material support for the repression of democratic opposition by assisting and facilitating such acts.
15.6.2026
77.Oleg Borisovich TAYAKIN
(Russian: Олег Борисович ТАЯКИН)
a.k.a. Oleg TARASOV
(Russian: Олег ТАРАСОВ)
Position: Officer in the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB) Institute of Forensic Science
DOB: 6.12.1980 (6.6.1980 for alias Oleg Tarasov)
POB: Russian SSR (now Russian Federation)
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Oleg Tayakin is an officer in the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB) Institute of Forensic Science who played a central role in the surveillance and communications operations surrounding the chemical poisoning of Alexei Navalny. According to the findings regarding that poisoning, Oleg Tayakin acted as a primary coordinator for the mission, managing communications and logistical support from a Moscow-based command centre of the FSB.
Therefore, Oleg Tayakin is responsible for providing technical and material support for the repression of democratic opposition by assisting and facilitating such acts.
15.6.2026
78.Alexander Grigorievich MURAKHOVSKY
(Russian: Александр Григорьевич МУРАХОВСКИЙ)
Position: Former Chief Physician of Omsk Emergency Hospital No 1; current Head of a military hospital in Omsk
DOB: 1.7.1971
POB: Omsk, Russian SSR (now Russian Federation)
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Alexander Murakhovsky is the former Chief Physician of Omsk Emergency Hospital No 1. In that position, he denied that Alexei Navalny had been poisoned, stated that Alexei Navalny suffered from ‘metabolic disorders’ and refused to transfer him to Germany for treatment. Subsequently, analyses carried out in Germany confirmed Alexei Navalny’s poisoning with a substance from the Novichok group. Alexander Murakhovsky is currently working as the Head of a military hospital in Omsk.
Therefore, Alexander Murakhovsky is responsible for providing technical and material support for the repression of democratic opposition by assisting and facilitating such acts.
15.6.2026
79.Aleksandr Vladimirovich SABAEV
(Russian: Александр Владимирович САБАЕВ)
Position: Chief Toxicologist and Head of the Department of Acute Poisoning of the Omsk Emergency Hospital no. 1
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Aleksandr Sabaev is the Chief Toxicologist of the hospital where Alexei Navalny received medical treatment before his medical evacuation to Germany following an attempt to assassinate him by poisoning. Aleksandr Sabaev repeatedly dismissed the poisoning of Alexei Navalny, blamed his medical condition on a metabolic disorder and refused to release information about Alexei Navalny’s medical condition to his associates.
Therefore, Aleksandr Sabaev is responsible for providing technical and material support for the repression of democratic opposition by assisting and facilitating such acts.
15.6.2026
80.Anatolii Vyacheslavovich RAZINKIN
(Russian: Анатолий Вячеславович РАЗИНКИН)
Position: First Deputy Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation
DOB: 24.1.1977
POB: Samara Region, Russian SSR (now Russian Federation)
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Anatolii Razinkin is the First Deputy Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation. In that position, he approved Alexei Navalny’s indictment in a criminal case for fraud and contempt of court. In March 2022, the court found Alexei Navalny guilty of fraud and contempt of court and sentenced him to nine years in a penal colony, taking into account all sentences.
Therefore, Anatolii Razinkin is responsible for serious violations of human rights, including violating freedom of opinion and expression, and for activities seriously undermining the rule of law in Russia.
15.6.2026
81.Alexei Anatolevich ALEKSANDROV
(Russian: Алексей Анатольевич АЛЕКСАНДРОВ)
Position: Major General of Justice and Head of the Eastern Interregional Investigative Department for Transport of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation; former Head of the West Siberian Transport Investigation Department of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation
DOB: 22.12.1975
POB: Russian SSR (now Russian Federation)
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
INN (Russian Tax ID): 220408759681
Alexei Aleksandrov is a Major General of Justice who served as Head of the West Siberian Transport Investigation Department of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation at the time of Alexei Navalny’s poisoning. In that capacity, Alexei Aleksandrov refused to investigate the poisoning of Alexei Navalny.
In 2022, Alexei Aleksandrov was promoted to Head of the Eastern Interregional Investigative Department for Transport of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation and he has been working in that role since.
Therefore, Alexei Aleksandrov is responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights and for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition.
15.6.2026
82.Natalia Vladimirovna KONOVALOVA
(Russian: Наталья Владимировна КОНОВАЛОВА)
Position: Judge of the Moscow City Court
DOB: 15.12.1972
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Natalia Konovalova is a Judge of the Moscow City Court. She upheld the decision of the Lefortovo District Court, which had rejected the complaint against the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB) Investigative Directorate for its inaction regarding Alexei Navalny’s poisoning.
Furthermore, Natalia Konovalova had previously extended the detention of members of the band Pussy Riot and upheld the arrests of American journalist Evan Gershkovich, Russian journalist Ivan Safronov and Russian student Ibragim Orudzhey.
Therefore, Natalia Konovalova is responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights and for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition.
15.6.2026
83.Marina Andreeva BOBEK
(Russian: Марина Андреева БОБЕК)
Position: Prosecutor of the Department of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation
DOB: 12.8.1986
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Marina Bobek is a Prosecutor of the Department of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation. In that position, she has been responsible for multiple cases of criminal prosecution of citizens of the Russian Federation who oppose the current political regime, including cases concerning Alexei Navalny.
Therefore, Marina Bobek is responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights and for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition.
15.6.2026
84.Ekaterina Petrovna IVANNIKOVA
(Russian: Екатерина Петровна ИВАННИКОВА)
Position: Prosecutor of the Appeals Department of the Criminal and Judicial Department of the Prosecutor’s Office, Moscow
DOB: 6.4.1988
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Ekaterina Ivannikova is a Prosecutor of the Appeals Department of the Criminal and Judicial Department of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation. In that position, she has been responsible for the criminal prosecution of citizens of the Russian Federation who oppose the current political regime. Ekaterina Ivannikova was involved in sabotaging the investigation into the poisoning of Alexei Navalny. Additionally, Ekaterina Ivannikova was involved in the Serebrennikov case by refusing to transfer Alexei Malobrodsky from detention to a house arrest.
Therefore, Ekaterina Ivannikova is responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights, the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and activities which seriously undermine democracy or the rule of law in Russia.
15.6.2026
85.Aleksandr Vladimirovich GUTSAN
(Russian: Александр Владимирович ГУЦАН)
Position: Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation
DOB: 6.7.1960
POB: Siversky settlement, Gatchinsky District, Leningrad Region, Russian SSR (now Russian Federation)
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
INN (Russian Tax ID): 781610240809
Aleksandr Gutsan has been the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation since September 2025. In that position, he was responsible for the petition to have the Russian state declare Alexei Navalny’s organisation the Anti-Corruption Foundation (ACF) as a terrorist organisation, thus criminalising any association with the ACF. That criminalisation has resulted in a large number of arrests of supporters of the ACF on charges of ‘terrorist financing’.
Therefore, Aleksandr Gutsan is responsible for serious violations and abuses of human rights, the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and activities which seriously undermine democracy and the rule of law in Russia.
15.6.2026
86.Oleg Nikolaevich NEFEDOV
(Russian: Олег Николаевич НЕФЕДОВ)
Position: Judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation; Chairman of the Judicial Composition of the First Instance of the Judicial Collegium for Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
DOB: 1.8.1974
POB: Kuznetsk, Russian SSR (now Russian Federation)
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
SNILS: 07750947803
Oleg Nefedov has been a Judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation since 2017 and has served as Chairman of the Judicial Composition of the First Instance of the Judicial Collegium for Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation since 2023.
In his role as Judge of the Supreme Court, Oleg Nefedov has presided over multiple rulings to limit freedom of organisation, political opposition and human rights, including the designation of Alexei Navalny’s organisation the Anti-Corruption Foundation as a terrorist organisation. Oleg Nefedov also ruled to ban the so-called ‘international LGBT-movement’.
Therefore, Oleg Nefedov is responsible for serious violations and abuses of human rights, the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, and activities which seriously undermine democracy and the rule of law in Russia.
15.6.2026
87.Roman Yurievich PLUGIN
(Russian: Роман Юрьевич ПЛУГИН)
Position: Lieutenant General of Police; Commissioner of the Saint Petersburg Police; Head of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for Saint Petersburg and the Leningrad Region
DOB: 10.3.1975
POB: Stavropol, Russian SSR (now Russian Federation)
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
TIN: 502719429607
SNILS: 10906646049
Roman Plugin is the Head of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for Saint Petersburg and the Leningrad region, also called the Saint Petersburg Police.
In that position, he is responsible for limiting freedom of speech by ordering the arrest and detention of peaceful mourners of Alexei Navalny on the anniversary of his death, and the arrest of peaceful street musicians in Saint Petersburg singing songs perceived as expressing support for the opposition.
Therefore, Roman Plugin is responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights, and activities which otherwise seriously undermine democracy or the rule of law in Russia.
15.6.2026
88.Elena Gennadyevna BAGUDINA
(Russian: Елена Геннадьевна БАГУДИНА)
Position: General Director of Communication Platform LLC
DOB: 11.3.1954
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Elena Bagudina is the General Director of Communication Platform LLC, which is a subsidiary of VK (previously known as VKontakte) and the developer and manager of state-supported mobile phone application Max. In her position as General Director, she is responsible for the development and management of the Max application. The development of the Max application was supervised by the Federal Security Service (FSB), which established the requirements that the developers of the Max application had to meet. The Max application must be pre-installed on all mobile phones and tablets sold in Russia and is integrated with the Gosuslugi service.
According to numerous experts, the Max application has extensive surveillance features and can monitor communications, including the use of virtual private networks (VPNs), gather data on other applications installed on phones, monitor address books, identify the location of users and install autonomous updates. The introduction and promotion of the Max application by the Russian state have been accompanied by a crackdown on and blocking of other independent applications, such as WhatsApp and Telegram, as well as by a campaign to limit the use of VPNs, which allowed users to access content blocked in Russia.
Information gathered by Russian authorities through the Max application served as a basis to fine a Russian citizen for content posted on the application.
Therefore, Elena Bagudina provides technical support for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, including by assisting and facilitating such acts.
13.7.2026
89.Dmitry Valerianovich GACHKO
(Russian: Дмитрий Валерьянович ГАЧКО)
Position: General Director and ultimate owner of VAS Experts
DOB: 16.8.1976
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Dmitry Gachko is the General Director and ultimate owner of the limited liability company VAS Experts, which manufactures, develops and sells hardware and software related to the so-called System of Operative Investigative Measures (SORM). In his position as General Director and ultimate owner, he is responsible for VAS Experts’ activities relating to the manufacture and supply of SORM-related hardware and software.
SORM is a surveillance system used since the mid-1990s to control internet and mobile communications in Russia, namely the monitoring of phone calls, emails, internet use, text messages and social networks. Mobile phones and internet providers are legally required to install SORM. It is installed in all Russian data centres and at all internet exchange points and within major search engines. User traffic is copied to a separate server or to a data centre available to the Federal Security Service (FSB).
SORM gathers information about users’ physical location, activity patterns, time of device use, users’ behaviour and the use of different SIM cards in one or more devices. It can be used retroactively and without the provider’s knowledge.
SORM has been used to target journalists, opposition figures, minority groups and ordinary citizens. It has also been used to prosecute supporters of the Russian opposition, leaders such as Alexei Navalny, organisers of protests, individuals who ran internet accounts critical of the Russian authorities or produced reports on the political situations and activists who opposed the war of aggression against Ukraine. SORM has also been used to pre-emptively detain individuals suspected of anti-government activities. SORM has had a profound impact on the ability of Russian citizens to access unbiased information about the war of aggression against Ukraine. It was also used to block traffic from, and access to, thousands of Western websites and services.
VAS Experts is involved in the development, supply and maintenance of SORM, including hardware and software integrated into telecoms networks, therefore allowing intelligence agencies to directly access all traffic. VAS Experts is a key supplier of SORM that complies with interception requirements mandated by the FSB and supports the operation of Russia’s communications surveillance infrastructure. VAS Experts operates within a framework established and supervised by the Russian authorities. These authorities approve technical requirements for SORM deployment, require operators to coordinate implementation plans, oversee compliance and use the equipment for direct interception activities. Consequently, VAS Experts develops and supplies equipment specifically designed to satisfy surveillance requirements established by the FSB.
Therefore, Dmitry Gachko provides material support for serious violations and abuses of human rights and for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition.
13.7.2026
90.Sergey Anatolevich OVCHINNIKOV
(Russian: Сергей Анатольевич ОВЧИННИКОВ)
Position: Executive Director and ultimate owner of Closed Joint-Stock Company ‘Norsi-Trans’
DOB: 5.5.1955
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Sergey Ovchinnikov is the Executive Director and ultimate owner of Closed Joint-Stock Company ‘Norsi-Trans’, which manufactures, develops and sells hardware and software related to the so-called System of Operative Investigative Measures (SORM). In his position as Executive Director and ultimate owner, he is responsible for Norsi-Trans’ activities relating to the manufacture and supply of SORM-related hardware and software.
SORM is a surveillance system used since the mid-1990s to control internet and mobile communications in Russia, namely the monitoring of phone calls, emails, internet use, text messages and social networks. Mobile phone and internet providers are legally required to install SORM. It is installed in all Russian data centres and at all internet exchange points and within major search engines. User traffic is copied to a separate server or to a data centre available to the Federal Security Service (FSB).
SORM gathers information about users’ physical location, activity patterns, time of device use, users’ behaviour and the use of different SIM cards in one or more devices. It can be used retroactively and without the provider’s knowledge.
SORM has been used to target journalists, opposition figures, minority groups and ordinary citizens. It has also been used to prosecute supporters of the Russian opposition, leaders such as Alexei Navalny, organisers of protests, individuals who ran internet accounts critical of the Russian authorities or produced reports on the political situations and activists who opposed the war of aggression against Ukraine. SORM has also been used to pre-emptively detain individuals suspected of anti-government activities. SORM has had a profound impact on Russians’ ability to access unbiased information about the war of aggression against Ukraine. It was used to block traffic from, and access to, thousands of Western websites and services.
Norsi-Trans is involved in the development, supply and maintenance of SORM, including hardware and software integrated into telecoms networks, therefore allowing intelligence agencies to directly access all traffic. SORM includes monitoring equipment installed in facilities of telecommunications providers. Such monitoring equipment provides information to the Russian government’s intelligence agency, including on phone calls, text messages, emails and internet traffic. SORM also facilitates access to communications data associated with messaging application, metadata, mobile numbers, phone identifiers, geolocation, names, email addresses and IP addresses.
Norsi-Trans is a key supplier of SORM that complies with interception requirements mandated by the FSB and supports the operation of Russia’s communications surveillance infrastructure. Norsi-Trans operates within a framework established and supervised by the Russian authorities. These authorities approve technical requirements for SORM deployment, require operators to coordinate implementation plans, oversee compliance and use the equipment for direct interception activities. Consequently, Norsi-Trans develops and supplies equipment specifically designed to satisfy surveillance requirements established by the FSB.
Therefore, Sergey Ovchinnikov provides material support for serious violations and abuses of human rights and for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition.
13.7.2026
91.Mikhail Mikhailovich FOMIN
(Russian: Михаил Михайлович ФОМИН)
Position: Executive Director of LLC Citadel
DOB: 22.3.1981
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Mikhail Fomin is the Executive Director of LLC Citadel.
LLC Citadel operates in Moscow and Nizhny Novgorod and develops, implements and provides support for software and hardware of the so-called System of Operative Investigative Measures (SORM). LLC Citadel is the largest manufacturer and reportedly the most important supplier of SORM hardware and software in Russia. In his position as Executive Director, Mikhail Fomin is responsible for LLC Citadel’s activities relating to the manufacture and supply of SORM-related hardware and software.
SORM is a surveillance system used since the mid-1990s to control internet and mobile communications in Russia, namely the monitoring of phone calls, emails, internet use, text messages and social networks. Mobile phone and internet providers are legally required to install SORM. It is installed in all Russian data centres and at all internet exchange points and within major search engines. The user traffic is copied to a separate server or to a data centre available to the Federal Security Service (FSB).
SORM gathers information about users’ physical location, activity patterns, time of device use, users’ behaviour and the use of different SIM cards in one or more devices. It can be used retroactively and without the provider’s knowledge.
SORM has been used to target journalists, opposition figures, minority groups and ordinary citizens. It has also been used to prosecute supporters of the Russian opposition, leaders such as Alexei Navalny, organisers of protests, individuals who ran internet accounts critical of the Russian authorities or produced reports on the political situations and activists who opposed the war of aggression against Ukraine. SORM has also been used to pre-emptively detain individuals suspected of anti-government activities. SORM has had a profound impact on the ability of Russian citizens to access unbiased information about the war of aggression against Ukraine. It was also used to block traffic from, and access to, thousands of Western websites and services.
LLC Citadel is involved in the development, supply and maintenance of SORM, including hardware and software integrated into telecoms networks, therefore allowing intelligence agencies to directly access all traffic. SORM includes monitoring equipment installed in facilities of telecommunications providers. Such monitoring equipment provides information to the Russian government’s intelligence agency, including on phone calls, text messages, emails and internet traffic. SORM also facilitates access to communications data associated with messaging application, metadata, mobile numbers, phone identifiers, geolocation, names and email addresses and IP addresses.
LLC Citadel is a key supplier of SORM that complies with interception requirements mandated by the FSB and supports the operation of Russia’s communications surveillance infrastructure. LLC Citadel operates within a framework established and supervised by the Russian authorities. These authorities approve technical requirements for SORM deployment, require operators to coordinate implementation plans, oversee compliance and use the equipment for direct interception activities. Consequently, LLC Citadel develops and supplies equipment specifically designed to satisfy surveillance requirements established by the FSB.
Therefore, Mikhail Fomin provides material support for serious violations and abuses of human rights and for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition.
13.7.2026
92.Alexander Vladimirovich GNUTOV
(Russian: Александр Владимирович ГНУТОВ)
Position: Head of Penal Colony No 10 (since 2024)
Former Deputy Head of Penal Colony No 10 (from 2022 to 2024)
DOB: 9.8.1980
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Passport number: 6100202615
Alexander Gnutov is the Head of Penal Colony No 10, which is located in the village of Udarny in the Zubovo-Polyansky District of the Republic of Mordovia. In that position, he directly oversees and is responsible for actions carried out in the Penal Colony No 10, and has failed to ensure the protection of detainees’ rights and safety and the maintenance of law and order. Alexander Gnutov therefore bears responsibility for the abuse of prisoners committed by the staff of Penal Colony 10.
Hundreds of Ukrainian prisoners of war as well as Ukrainian civilians captured in the occupied Ukrainian territories have been held in Penal Colony No 10. Former detainees report inhuman and degrading treatment and torture, including electric shocks, beating, stress positions causing trophic ulcers, sexual violence, mock executions and the denial of medical care. Civilians are subjected to the same treatment as prisoners of war and are held without trial or status. Human rights defenders have reported about inhuman conditions and torture in Penal Colony No 10 since 2012, including towards Russian prisoners.
Therefore, Alexander Gnutov is responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights, including torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
13.7.2026
93.Alexei Vladimirovich ANASHKIN
(Russian: Алексей Владимирович АНАШКИН)
Position: Deputy Head of Penal Colony No 10
DOB: 9.6.1978
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Passport number: 8902524698
Alexei Anashkin is the Deputy Head of Penal Colony No 10, which is located in the village of Udarny in the Zubovo-Polyansky District of the Republic of Mordovia. In that position, he directly oversees and is responsible for actions carried out in Penal Colony No 10, and has failed to ensure the protection of detainees’ rights and safety and the maintenance of law and order. Alexei Anashkin therefore bears responsibility for the abuse of prisoners committed by the staff of Penal Colony No 10.
Hundreds of Ukrainian prisoners of war as well as Ukrainian civilians captured in the occupied Ukrainian territories have been held in the Penal Colony No 10. Former detainees report inhuman and degrading treatment and torture, including electric shocks, beating, stress positions causing trophic ulcers, sexual violence, mock executions and the denial of medical care. Civilians are subjected to the same treatment as prisoners of war and are held without trial or status. Human rights defenders have reported about inhuman conditions and torture in this facility since 2012, including towards Russian prisoners.
Therefore, Alexei Anashkin is responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights, including torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
13.7.2026
94.Egor Viktorovich AVERKIN
(Russian: Егор Викторович АВЕРКИН)
Position: Deputy Head of Penal Colony No 10
DOB: 8.10.1992
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Passport number: 8912267789
Egor Averkin is the Deputy Head of Penal Colony No 10, which is located in the village of Udarny in the Zubovo-Polyansky District of the Republic of Mordovia. In that position, he directly oversees and is responsible for actions carried out in Penal Colony No 10, and has failed to ensure the protection of detainees’ rights and safety and the maintenance of law and order. Egor Averkin therefore bears responsibility for the abuse of prisoners committed by the staff of Penal Colony No 10.
Hundreds of Ukrainian prisoners of war as well as Ukrainian civilians captured in the occupied Ukrainian territories have been held in Penal Colony No 10. Former detainees report inhuman and degrading treatment and torture, including electric shocks, beating, stress positions causing trophic ulcers, sexual violence, mock executions and the denial of medical care. Civilians are subjected to the same treatment as prisoners of war and are held without trial or status. Human rights defenders have reported about inhuman conditions and torture in this facility since 2012, including towards Russian prisoners.
Therefore, Egor Averkin is responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights, including torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
13.7.2026
95.Alexander Anatolevich GRISHANIN
(Russian: Александр Анатольевич ГРИШАНИН)
Position: Deputy Head of Penal Colony No 10
DOB: 6.10.1991
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Passport number: 8911222216
Alexander Grishanin is the Deputy Head of Penal Colony No 10, which is located in the village of Udarny in the Zubovo-Polyansky District of the Republic of Mordovia. In that position, he directly oversees and is responsible for actions carried out in Penal Colony No 10, and has failed to ensure the protection of detainees’ rights and safety and the maintenance of law and order. Alexander Grishanin therefore bears responsibility for the abuse of prisoners committed by the staff of Penal Colony No 10.
Hundreds of Ukrainian prisoners of war as well as Ukrainian civilians captured in the occupied Ukrainian territories have been held in Penal Colony No 10. Former detainees report inhuman and degrading treatment and torture, including electric shocks, beating, stress positions causing trophic ulcers, sexual violence, mock executions and the denial of medical care. Civilians are subjected to the same treatment as prisoners of war and are held without trial or status. Human rights defenders have reported about inhuman conditions and torture in this facility since 2012, including towards Russian prisoners.
Therefore, Alexander Grishanin is responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights, including torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
13.7.2026
96.Semyon Viktorovich KUZNETSOV
(Russian: Семен Викторович КУЗНЕЦОВ)
Position: Deputy Head of Penal Colony No 10
DOB: 18.11.1982
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Passport number: 79271857062
Semyon Kuznetsov is the Deputy Head of Penal Colony No 10, which is located in the village of Udarny in the Zubovo-Polyansky District of the Republic of Mordovia. In that position, he directly oversees and is responsible for actions carried out in Penal Colony No 10, and has failed to ensure the protection of detainees’ rights and safety and the maintenance of law and order. Semyon Kuznetsov therefore bears responsibility for the abuse of prisoners committed by the staff of Penal Colony No 10.
Hundreds of Ukrainian prisoners of war as well as Ukrainian civilians captured in the occupied Ukrainian territories have been held in Penal Colony No 10. Former detainees report inhuman and degrading treatment and torture, including electric shocks, beating, stress positions causing trophic ulcers, sexual violence, mock executions and the denial of medical care. Civilians are subjected to the same treatment as prisoners of war and are held without trial or status. Human rights defenders have reported about inhuman conditions and torture in this facility since 2012, including towards Russian prisoners.
Therefore, Semyon Kuznetsov is responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights, including torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
13.7.2026
97.Ivan Vasilyevich VESHKIN
(Russian: Иван Васильевич ВЕШКИН)
Position: Deputy Head of Penal Colony No 10
DOB: 22.12.1991
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Passport number: 8903739994
Ivan Veshkin is the Deputy Head of Penal Colony No 10, which is located in the village of Udarny in the Zubovo-Polyansky District of the Republic of Mordovia. In that position, he directly oversees and is responsible for actions carried out in Penal Colony No 10, and has failed to ensure the protection of detainees’ rights and safety and the maintenance of law and order. Ivan Veshkin therefore bears responsibility for the abuse of prisoners committed by the staff of Penal Colony No 10.
Hundreds of Ukrainian prisoners of war as well as Ukrainian civilians captured in the occupied Ukrainian territories have been held in the Penal Colony No 10. Former detainees report inhuman and degrading treatment and torture, including electric shocks, beating, stress positions causing trophic ulcers, sexual violence, mock executions and the denial of medical care. Civilians are subjected to the same treatment as prisoners of war and are held without trial or status. Human rights defenders have reported about inhuman conditions and torture in this facility since 2012, including towards Russian prisoners.
Therefore, Ivan Veshkin is responsible for violations or abuses of human rights, including torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
13.7.2026
98.Galina Vasilievna MOKSHANOVA
(Russian: Галина Васильевна МОКШАНОВА)
Position: Head of Medical Unit No 13, Penal Colony No 10
DOB: 16.1.1966
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Passport number: 8910200628
Galina Mokshanova is the Head of Medical Unit No 13 of Penal Colony No 10, which is located in the village of Udarny in the Zubovo-Polyansky District of the Republic of Mordovia. In that position, she plans, directs, orders and facilitates activities carried out in medical services of Penal Colony No 10. Galina Mokshanova therefore bears responsibility for the abuse of prisoners committed by the staff of Penal Colony No 10.
Hundreds of Ukrainian prisoners of war as well as Ukrainian civilians captured in the occupied Ukrainian territories have been held in the Penal Colony No 10. Former detainees report inhuman and degrading treatment and torture, including electric shocks, beating, stress positions causing trophic ulcers, sexual violence, mock executions and the denial of medical care. Civilians are subjected to the same treatment as prisoners of war and are held without trial or status. Human rights defenders have reported about inhuman conditions and torture in this facility since 2012, including towards Russian prisoners.
Therefore, Galina Mokshanova is responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights, including torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
13.7.2026
99.Vyacheslav Sergeevich KIRILLOV
(Вячеслав Сергеевич КИРИЛЛОВ)
Position: judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
DOB: 22.6.1966
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Vyacheslav Kirillov is a judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. On 10 August 2026, he delivered a verdict barring the Yabloko political party from participating in the September 2026 elections to the State Duma because of alleged breaches of copyright, extremism and other misconduct. Yabloko was the only political party that openly opposed Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.
On 9 April 2026, he ruled on the case of the human rights organisation Memorial, designating it as an extremist organisation and banning its activities in Russia.
He is therefore responsible for the repression of democratic opposition, and his activities seriously undermine democracy and the rule of law in Russia.
28.9.2026
100.Igor Nikolayevich ZINCHENKO
(Игорь Николаевич ЗИНЧЕНКО)
Position: judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, deputy chairman of the Appellate Chamber of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
DOB: 25.3.1971
POB: Shadrino, Kozulsky District, Krasnoyarsk Krai, former USSR (now Russian Federation)
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Igor Zinchenko is a judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. He was a member of a judicial panel that upheld the decision barring the Yabloko political party from participating in the September 2026 elections to the State Duma because of alleged breaches of copyright, extremism, support for the LGBT movement and other misconduct. Yabloko was the only political party that openly opposed Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.
He is therefore responsible for the repression of democratic opposition, and his activities seriously undermine democracy and the rule of law in Russia.
28.9.2026
101.Denis Vladimirovich TYUTIN
(Денис Владимирович ТЮТИН)
Position: judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
DOB: 25.4.1971
POB: Gorky (now Nizhny Novgorod), former USSR (now Russian Federation)
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Denis Tyutin is a judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. He was a member of a judicial panel that upheld the decision barring the Yabloko political party from participating in the September 2026 elections to the State Duma because of alleged breaches of copyright, extremism, support for the LGBT movement and other misconduct. Yabloko was the only political party that openly opposed Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.
He is therefore responsible for the repression of democratic opposition, and his activities seriously undermine democracy and the rule of law in Russia.
28.9.2026
102.Sergey Fyodorovich SAKHAROV
(Сергей Фёдорович САХАРОВ)
Position: head of the Division for Electoral Disputes and Judicial Representation of the Legal Department of the Central Election Commission of Russia
DOB: 15.11.1987
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Sergey Sakharov is the head of the Division for Electoral Disputes and Judicial Representation of the Legal Department of the Central Election Commission of Russia. In this capacity, he took part in proceedings before the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation aimed at barring the Yabloko political party from participating in the September 2026 elections to the State Duma. He openly supported the application of the Rodina party, which sought to bar Yabloko on the grounds of alleged breaches of copyright, extremism, support for the LGBT movement and other misconduct. Yabloko was the only political party that openly opposed Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.
He is therefore providing material support for the repression of democratic opposition and for activities that seriously undermine democracy and the rule of law in Russia, including by assisting, facilitating or encouraging such acts.
28.9.2026
103.Ilya Vladimirovich RUSAKOV
(Илья Владимирович РУСАКОВ)
Position: official in the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation
DOB: 15.8.1986
Nationality: Russian
Gender: male
Ilya Rusakov is an official in the Prosecutor General’s Office. In this capacity, he took part in proceedings before the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation aimed at barring the Yabloko political party from participating in the September 2026 elections to the State Duma. He openly supported the application of the Rodina party, which sought to bar Yabloko on the grounds of alleged breaches of copyright, extremism, support for the LGBT movement and other misconduct. Yabloko was the only political party that openly opposed Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.
He is therefore providing material support for the repression of democratic opposition and for activities that seriously undermine democracy and the rule of law in Russia, including by assisting, facilitating or encouraging such acts.
28.9.2026
104.Viktoria Mikhailovna MALYAMOVA
(Виктория Михайловна МАЛЯМОВА)
Position: judge of Pskov City Court
DOB: 1.3.1973
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Viktoria Malyamova is a judge of Pskov City Court. She sentenced Lev Shlosberg, an opposition politician from the Yabloko political party, to 11 years and one month of imprisonment for discrediting the Russian army and ‘fake news’ regarding Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.
She is therefore responsible for serious violations and abuses of human rights and for the repression of democratic opposition, and her activities seriously undermine democracy and the rule of law in Russia.
28.9.2026
105.Anna Sergeevna GORYACHOVA
(Анна Сергеевна ГОРЯЧЕВА)
Position: state prosecutor
DOB: 9.4.1998
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Anna Goryachova is a state prosecutor. She requested 12 years and one month of imprisonment for Lev Shlosberg, an opposition politician from the Yabloko political party, for discrediting the Russian army and ‘fake news’ regarding Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. Shlosberg was subsequently sentenced to 11 years and one month of imprisonment. Prior to that trial, Anna Goryachova prosecuted Lev Shlosberg in a case regarding the violation of ‘foreign agent’ legislation, where she requested 440 hours of compulsory work. Shlosberg was sentenced to 420 hours by the court.
She is therefore responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights and for the repression of democratic opposition, and her activities seriously undermine democracy and the rule of law in Russia.
28.9.2026
106.Yulia Igorevna GUZNYAEVA
(Юлия Игоревна ГУЗНЯЕВА)
Position: assistant prosecutor of the Central Administrative District of Moscow
DOB: 30.5.1996
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Yulia Guznyaeva is assistant prosecutor of the Central Administrative District of Moscow. She was the state prosecutor in the trial of Maxim Kruglov, one of the leaders of the Yabloko political party. She requested an eight-year prison sentence for Kruglov’s social media posts concerning Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, specifically the war crimes committed in Bucha and Mariupol.
She is therefore responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights and for the repression of democratic opposition, and her activities seriously undermine democracy and the rule of law in Russia.
28.9.2026
107.Elina Arturovna BABAYANTS
(Элина Артуровна БАБАЯНЦ)
Position: judge of Zamoskvoretsky District Court, Moscow
DOB: 25.7.1995
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Elina Babayants is a judge of Zamoskvoretsky District Court in Moscow. She was the judge in the trial of Maxim Kruglov, one of the leaders of the Yabloko political party. She sentenced Kruglov to seven years in a penal colony and banned him from using the internet for three years for his social media posts concerning Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, specifically the war crimes committed in Bucha and Mariupol.
She is therefore responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights and for the repression of democratic opposition, and her activities seriously undermine democracy and the rule of law in Russia.
28.9.2026
108.Elizaveta Sergeevna TRUSKALENKO
(Елизавета Сергеевна ТРУСКАЛЕНКО)
Position: judge of the Vyborsky district of St Petersburg
DOB: 18.10.1984
Nationality: Russian
Gender: female
Elizaveta Truskalenko is a judge of the Vyborsky district of St Petersburg. She was the judge in the trial of Nikolai Rybakov, the chairman of the Yabloko political party. She found Rybakov guilty and ordered him to pay a fine for posting a photograph of the late Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny. The ruling effectively barred Rybakov from running in the September 2026 elections to the State Duma.
She is therefore responsible for serious violations or abuses of human rights and for the repression of democratic opposition, and her activities seriously undermine democracy and the rule of law in Russia.
28.9.2026

Β. Legal persons, entities and bodies

NameIdentifying informationStatement of ReasonsDate of listing
1.FEDERAL PENITENTIARY SERVICE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
(FSIN)
ФЕДЕРАЛЬНАЯ СЛУЖБА ИСПОЛНЕНИЯ НАКАЗАНИЙ
(ФСИН) (RU)
Address: Zhitnaya Street 14 Yakimanka District, Central Administrative Okrug, Moscow
Website: http://www.fsin.su/eng
The Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation (FSIN) is a federal agency under the supervision of the Ministry of Justice of Russia. FSIN is the federal authority for the detention of suspected and convicted persons, the security and maintenance of prisons in Russia, the transport of prisoners, and rehabilitation programmes.
As such, FSIN is the central authority managing the Russian prison system, known for its widespread and systematic abuses against, and ill-treatment of, political prisoners in Russia. As a federal agency, FSIN is responsible for the penal colonies where Russian opposition politician Alexei Navalny was held on politically motivated charges and ultimately died on 16 February 2024. During his imprisonment, Alexei Navalny suffered abuses, including through solitary confinement in a punishment cell and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, leading to the severe deterioration of his health. Other political prisoners held in the Russian prison system under similarly harsh conditions of detention, are subjected to abuse and ill-treatment, which is meant to physically and psychologically break them.
FSIN is therefore responsible for serious human rights violations in Russia, including torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
27.5.2024
2.IPJSC NTK
a.k.a. International Public Joint-Stock Company NTK
a.k.a. NTH International Joint Stock Company
a.k.a. MKAO NTKh
a.k.a. MKAO NTH
(Russian: МКАО НТХ)
Address: 236004, Kaliningrad region, Kaliningrad, Okyabrskaya street 71-73, room 25
Email: info@ntechlab.ru
Russian website: www.ntechlab.ru
International website: www.ntechlab.com
INN: 3900040153
KPP: 390001001
OGRN: 1253900004412
OKPO: 87427827
IPJSC NTK is the holding company of NtechLab. NtechLab is a Russian facial recognition technology company subject to restrictive measures imposed by the Union. IPJSC NTK has cooperated with the Department of Information Technologies of the City of Moscow in the development of the facial recognition system in Moscow.
The Main Directorate of Internal Affairs of the City of Moscow employed the facial recognition system in Moscow as a tool of repression to monitor and detain independent journalists, opposition activists and participants who were protesting peacefully in support of Alexei Navalny and in opposition to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. IPJSC NTK was established to take over the operations of NtechLab when the company relocated to Russia.
Therefore, IPJSC NTK is responsible for providing technical or material support for serious violations of human rights in Russia, including arbitrary arrests or detentions, and violations or abuses of freedom of peaceful assembly and of association.
15.6.2026
3.VK (previously known as Mail.ru group, VK Company Limited)
(Russian: VK)
Address: Moscow, 125167, Leningradsky prospekt 39, bld. 79
Vk.com
Vk.company
INN (Russian tax ID): 3900015862
TIN (TIN): 3900015862
OGRN (Trade register number): 1233900010585
VK is one of the main technological companies in Russia. It provides email and chat services and runs applications and the social media website VKontakte.
VK is the parent company of Communication Platform LLC, the developer and manager of state-supported mobile phone application Max. The development of the Max application was supervised by the Federal Security Service (FSB), which established requirements that the developers of the Max application had to meet. The Max application must be pre-installed on all mobile phones and tablets sold in Russia and is integrated with the Gosuslugi service.
According to numerous experts, the Max application has extensive surveillance features and can monitor communications, including the use of virtual private networks (VPNs), gather data on other applications installed on phones, monitor address books, identify the location of users and install autonomous updates. The introduction and promotion of the Max application by the Russian state have been accompanied by a crackdown on and blocking of other independent applications, such as WhatsApp and Telegram, as well as by a campaign to limit the use of VPNs, which allowed users to access content blocked in Russia.
Information gathered by Russian authorities through the Max application served as a basis to fine a Russian citizen for content posted on the application.
The Max application has benefitted from government-imposed blocks on access to Western and independent competitors, such as Instagram, Facebook, Telegram and WhatsApp, enabling it to increase its revenue and market share.
VK has cooperated with Russian authorities in their repressive actions, including by providing them with data concerning users of its services who posted content criticising Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, or other content banned by the authorities.
VK has also participated in the government-ordered ban on the use of VPNs, through which Russian internet users could previously access independent content on the internet.
Therefore, VK provides technical support for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, including by assisting and facilitating such acts.
13.7.2026
4.Communication Platform LLC
(Russian: Акционерное Общество Инвестиционная Компания Коммуникационная Платформа)
Address: PR-KT LENINGRADSKII D. 39, STR. 79, 125167 MOSCOW, Russian Federation
www.complatform.ru
mail@complatform.ru
INN (Russian tax ID): 9714058267
TIN (TIN): 9714058267
Communication Platform LLC is a subsidiary company of VK (previously known as VKontakte) and is the developer and manager of state-supported mobile phone application Max. The development of the Max application was supervised by the Federal Security Service (FSB), which established the requirements that the developers of the Max application had to meet. The Max application must be pre-installed on all mobile phones and tablets sold in Russia and is integrated with the Gosuslugi service.
According to numerous experts, the Max application has extensive surveillance features and can monitor communications, including the use of virtual private networks (VPNs), gather data on other applications installed on phones, monitor the address books, identify the location of the users and install autonomous updates. The introduction and promotion of the Max application by the Russian state have been accompanied by a crackdown on and blocking of other independent applications, such as WhatsApp and Telegram, as well as by a campaign to limit the use of VPNs, which allowed users to access content blocked in Russia.
Information gathered by Russian authorities through the Max application served as a basis to fine a Russian citizen for content posted on the application.
Therefore, Communication Platform LLC provides technical support for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, including by assisting and facilitating such acts.
13.7.2026
5.VAS Experts
(Russian: Общество с ограниченной ответственностью Вас Экспертс)
Address: Saint Petersburg, Avenue Liteyny 26, building a, office 5-13
OGRN: 1137847014337
INN (Russian tax ID) 7841476577
VAS Experts manufactures, develops, and sells hardware and software related to the so-called System of Operative Investigative Measures (SORM).
SORM is a surveillance system used since the mid-1990s to control internet and mobile communications in Russia, namely the monitoring of phone calls, emails, internet use, text messages and social networks. Mobile phone and internet providers are legally required to install SORM. It is installed in all Russian data centres and at all internet exchange points and within major search engines. User traffic is copied to a separate server or to a data centre available to the Federal Security Service (FSB).
SORM gathers information about users’ physical location, activity patterns, time of device use, users’ behaviour and the use of different SIM cards in one or more devices. It can be used retroactively and without the provider’s knowledge.
SORM has been used to target journalists, opposition figures, minority groups and ordinary citizens. It has also been used to prosecute supporters of the Russian opposition, leaders such as Alexei Navalny, organisers of protests, individuals who ran internet accounts critical of the Russian authorities or produced reports on the political situations and activists who opposed the war of aggression against Ukraine. SORM has also been used to pre-emptively detain individuals suspected of anti-government activities. SORM has had a profound impact on the ability of Russian citizens to access unbiased information about the war of aggression against Ukraine. It was also used to block traffic from, and access to, thousands of Western websites and services.
VAS Experts is involved in the development, supply and maintenance of SORM, including hardware and software integrated into telecoms networks, therefore allowing intelligence agencies to directly access all traffic.
VAS Experts is a key supplier of SORM that complies with interception requirements mandated by the FSB and supports the operation of Russia’s communications surveillance infrastructure.
VAS Experts operates within a framework established and supervised by the Russian authorities. These authorities approve technical requirements for SORM deployment, require operators to coordinate implementation plans, oversee compliance and use the equipment for direct interception activities. Consequently, VAS Experts develops and supplies equipment specifically designed to satisfy surveillance requirements established by the FSB.
Therefore, VAS Experts provides material support for serious violations and abuses of human rights and for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition.
13.7.2026
6.Norsi-Trans
a.k.a. Closed Joint-Stock Company ‘Norsi-Trans’
(Russian: Закрытое Акционерное Общество ‘Норси-Транс’)
Address: 127015 Moscow, Bolshaya Novodmitrovskaya Street 12, building 15, floor 2, room 36)
Date of registration: 16.1.2003
OGRN: 1037700030477
INN (Russian tax ID): 7705051215
Closed Joint-Stock Company ‘Norsi-Trans’ manufactures, develops, and sells hardware and software related to the so-called System of Operative Investigative Measures (SORM).
SORM is a surveillance system used since the mid-1990s to control internet and mobile communications in Russia, namely the monitoring of phone calls, emails, internet use, text messages and social networks. Mobile phone and internet providers are legally required to install SORM. It is installed in all Russian data centres and at all internet exchange points and within major search engines. User traffic is copied to a separate server or to a data centre available to the Federal Security Service (FSB).
SORM gathers information about users’ physical location, activity patterns, time of device use, users’ behaviour and the use of different SIM cards in one or more devices. It can be used retroactively and without the provider’s knowledge.
SORM has been used to target journalists, opposition figures, minority groups and ordinary citizens. It has also been used to prosecute supporters of the Russian opposition, leaders such as Alexei Navalny, organisers of protests, individuals who ran internet accounts critical of the Russian authorities or produced reports on the political situations and activists who opposed the war of aggression against Ukraine. It was also used to pre-emptively detain individuals suspected of anti-government activities. SORM has had a profound impact on Russians’ ability to access unbiased information about the war of aggression against Ukraine. It was also used to block traffic from, and access to, thousands of Western websites and services.
Norsi-Trans is involved in the development, supply and maintenance of SORM, including hardware and software that is integrated into telecoms networks, therefore allowing intelligence agencies to directly access all traffic. SORM includes monitoring equipment installed in facilities of telecommunications providers. Such monitoring equipment provides information to the Russian government’s intelligence agency, including on phone calls, text messages, emails and internet traffic. SORM also facilitates access to communications data associated with messaging application, metadata, mobile numbers, phone identifiers, geolocation, names, email addresses and IP addresses.
Norsi-Trans is a key supplier of SORM that complies with interception requirements mandated by the FSB and supports the operation of Russia’s communications surveillance infrastructure.
Norsi-Trans operates within a framework established and supervised by the Russian authorities. These authorities approve technical requirements for SORM deployment, require operators to coordinate implementation plans, oversee compliance and use the equipment for direct interception activities. Consequently, Norsi-Trans develops and supplies equipment specifically designed to satisfy surveillance requirements established by the FSB.
Therefore, Norsi-Trans provides material support for serious violations and abuses of human rights and for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition.
13.7.2026
7.LLC Citadel
(Russian: Общество с ограниченной ответственностью ‘Цитадель’)
Address: 127015 Moscow, Intra-city municipal territory municipal district Butyrsky, Novodmitrovskaya Street 2B
OGRN: 1157746895690
INN(Russian tax ID): 9701012339
Address: 603098, Nizhny Novgorod, pr. Gagarina, 50 (Korpus 9), BTS ‘Chiornaya Zhemchuzhina’
OGRN: 1055238018098
INN (Russian tax ID): 5260146265
LLC Citadel operates in Moscow and Nizhny Novgorod and develops, implements and provides support for software and hardware of the so-called System of Operative Investigative Measures (SORM). LLC Citadel is the largest manufacturer and reportedly the most important supplier of SORM hardware and software in Russia.
SORM is a surveillance system used since the mid-1990s to control internet and mobile communications in Russia, namely the monitoring of phone calls, emails, internet use, text messages and social networks. Mobile phone and internet providers are legally required to install SORM. It is installed in all Russian data centres and at all internet exchange points and within major search engines. The user traffic is copied to a separate server or to a data centre available to the Federal Security Service (FSB). SORM gathers information about users’ physical location, activity patterns, time of device use, users’ behaviour and the use of different SIM cards in one or more devices. It can be used retroactively and without the provider’s knowledge.
SORM has been used to target journalists, opposition figures, minority groups and ordinary citizens. It has also been used to prosecute supporters of the Russian opposition, leaders such as Alexei Navalny, organisers of protests, individuals who ran internet accounts critical of the Russian authorities or produced reports on the political situations and activists who opposed the war of aggression against Ukraine. SORM has also been used to pre-emptively detain individuals suspected of anti-government activities. It has had a profound impact on Russians’ ability to access unbiased information about the war of aggression against Ukraine and was used to block traffic from, and access to, thousands of Western websites and services.
LLC Citadel is involved in the development, supply and maintenance of SORM, including hardware and software integrated into telecoms networks, therefore allowing intelligence agencies to directly access all traffic. SORM includes monitoring equipment installed in facilities of telecommunications providers. Such monitoring equipment provides information to the Russian government’s intelligence agency, including on phone calls, text messages, emails and internet traffic. SORM also facilitates access to communications data associated with messaging application, metadata, mobile numbers, phone identifiers, geolocation, names, email addresses and IP addresses.
LLC Citadel is a key supplier of SORM that complies with interception requirements mandated by the FSB and supports the operation of Russia’s communications surveillance infrastructure.
LLC Citadel operates within a framework established and supervised by the Russian authorities. The authorities approve technical requirements for SORM deployment, require operators to coordinate implementation plans, oversee compliance and use the equipment for direct interception activities. Consequently, LLC Citadel develops and supplies equipment specifically designed to satisfy surveillance requirements.
Therefore, LLC Citadel provides material support for serious violations and abuses of human rights and for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition.
13.7.2026

1 Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, p. 1).

2 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1).

3 Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC (OJ L 141, 5.6.2015, p. 73).

4 Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 349).

5 Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 setting up a Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items (recast) (OJ L 206, 11.6.2021, p. 1).